Sookshmadarshini: A Thriller That Almost Hits the Mark

Sookshmadarshini might not feel entirely fresh, as it draws inspiration from various past works like Manhattan Murder Mystery (1993), In for a Murder (2021), and The Woman in the Window (2021), among others.

The story revolves around Priya, a microbiologist living happily with her husband and child. One day, her neighbour Manuel returns to his hometown with his mother, and from the very beginning, Priya senses something odd about him. The movie follows Priya’s observations and findings as she tries to uncover the mystery surrounding Manuel and his actions.

Trailer Sookshmadarshini

Sookshmadarshini sets out to be a compelling thriller, focusing on the “what” and “why” rather than the typical “whodunnit.” However, the lack of emotional depth and character development undermines its potential, leaving it a missed opportunity in the genre.

Priya’s Motivation: A Missed Opportunity for Emotional Depth

Priya’s skepticism toward her neighbour is established, but the why behind it isn’t developed well. She goes to extremes to uncover the truth, but the film struggles to make her motivations compelling. This disconnect diminishes the audience’s emotional engagement with her investigation.

In Manhattan Murder Mystery, Carol (played by Diane Keaton) is a housewife who becomes suspicious of her neighbour after the sudden death of his wife. The film builds Carol’s character through her curiosity, natural charm, and relentless energy.

Diane Keaton as Carol

Carol’s amateur sleuthing feels authentic because the narrative gives her relatable motivations: she’s bored with her life and eager to prove her intuition is right.

Another good example is character Anna Fox from The Woman in the Window (2021), the protagonist, is an agoraphobic psychologist who becomes obsessed with the lives of her neighbours. Anna’s character is layered: her psychological struggles, unreliable narration, and tragic backstory make her a flawed but relatable protagonist. The audience doesn’t just follow her investigation—they understand her pain and inner conflict, which adds emotional weight to her discoveries.

Writers should have added some emotional layers to Priya, like Anna’s struggles in The Woman in the Window, to create a stronger connection with the audience.

The Art of Distraction: Sookshmadarshini

Every mystery thriller works well when its distractions are crafted effectively. Writers often sprinkle events or characters to divert the audience’s attention from the actual clues. Take Kishkinda Kaandam as an example: the Maoism, the jungle, and Jagadeesh’s character—all serve as distractions. However, a clever writer always leaves the right hints, so when the truth is revealed, the audience can connect the dots they initially missed. That’s where the brilliance of a thriller writer truly shines.

Title Card: Sookshmadarshini

In Sookshmadarshini, the writers incorporated distractions and left clues for the audience. But by the end, you might wonder: was all this necessary? Was it exaggerated? The climax feels like a forced attempt to deliver a twist, making the payoff less satisfying.

A little more research could have made it better. For example, do you get notifications on Instagram when a random person (someone who doesn’t follow you or whom you don’t follow) sends you a message? I believe it mostly goes to message requests. That’s where the writers were in a rush to close the loop.

Casting and Tone Issues: Sookshmadarshini

While Basil does a commendable job portraying Manuel’s suspicious behaviour, his inherent charm works against the narrative. The audience doesn’t naturally hate or distrust him as they should.

Nightcrawler TRAILER

In contrast, performances like Jake Gyllenhaal’s eerie and unsettling portrayal of Louis Bloom in Nightcrawler (2014) or Vineeth Sreenivasan’s morally ambiguous Adv. Mukundan Unni in Mukundan Unni Associates ensure that the audience feels both repelled and fascinated. A similarly calculated casting choice for Manuel could have significantly amplified the tension.

Additionally, Nazriya is not entirely convincing as Priya—a super-observant, Lady Holmes-like housewife. Her portrayal feels more like her past characters, such as Jeena in Neram or Pooja in Om Shanthi Oshana. This lack of transformation dilutes the experience, especially in a genre where mood and atmosphere are critical.

Take, for example, Sharafudheen. In Bougainvillaea and Hello Mummy, his contrasting performances highlight how an actor can completely transform their mannerisms and attitude, creating a clear distinction between characters.

Even a static shot from either film would showcase the depth of his acting. This kind of immersion helps the audience bond with the character. Unfortunately, Priya’s character in Sookshmadarshini doesn’t achieve this, making it difficult to separate Nazriya’s performance from her previous roles.

Sookshmadarshini: Final Thoughts

Despite its flaws, Sookshmadarshini does manage to deliver a decent final act. The editing, especially in the climax, stands out, with smooth intercuts that effectively build tension and excitement while revealing the mystery. The background score complements these moments well, adding to the suspense.

While the screenplay takes some cinematic liberties, particularly in the second half, it might answer many of your WHY’s by the final twist. The seemingly distracting elements throughout the film make sense when viewed in hindsight, offering a sense of coherence to the overall narrative.

In the end, Sookshmadarshini succeeds in keeping the audience intrigued, even if it stumbles in emotional depth and character development. It’s a decent thriller that might not break new ground but manages to hold attention, especially in its well-executed final moments.

Share your thoughts as a comment.

Read about this week’s OTT Releases here.

What To Watch on OTT: November 1, 2024

What are the OTT releases, on this Friday (Nov 1, 2024)? With so many releases across platforms, here are 3 picks that I think are worth checking out. Lubber Pandhu, Agathokakological & Sattam En Kayil: are my suggestions. Why I pick those; scroll down to read more.

Lubber Pandhu: A Fresh Take on Cricket and Rivalries

Platform: Disney+ Hotstar
Director: Tamizharasan Pachamuthu
Cast: Harish Kalyan, Attakathi Dinesh, Sanjana Krishnamoorthy, Swasika

Plot Synopsis

Lubber Pandhu dives into the world of rubber-ball cricket in small-town Tamil Nadu, where Anbu (Harish Kalyan), a talented bowler, meets Gethu (Attakathi Dinesh), a highly respected batsman. Their rivalry on the field quickly extends into personal life when Anbu’s relationship with Gethu’s daughter, Durga (Sanjana Krishnamoorthy), is revealed. The film explores the ego-fueled rivalry between Anbu and Gethu, both players who are passionate about cricket and loyal to their friends and family.

As the story unfolds, we see how their conflicts also bring in themes of caste and family struggles. Interestingly, the women, including Gethu’s wife Yashoda (Swasika), emerge as the voices of reason, balancing the impulsive nature of their male counterparts.

Highlights

❤️ The film brings a fresh look at caste issues, weaving them into the story in a subtle yet powerful way.

❤️ The cricket scenes are exciting and feel authentic, with details like star-player songs and quirky cricket rituals adding charm.

❌ Some parts, like a forced empowerment angle, feel a bit out of place.

Lubber Pandhu is a feel-good sports drama with a unique twist, blending family rivalry, romance, and cricket. If you love sports films with heart, stream it on Disney+ Hotstar now!

Agathokakological: A Crime Thriller with Mixed Results

Platform: Manorama Max
Director: Venkatesh CD
Cast: Leona Lishoy, Prashant Murali, Maqbool Salman, Vasudevan Unni

Plot Synopsis: Agathokakological

Agathokakological tells the story of Nisha (Leona Lishoy), an architect who lives peacefully with her husband Vineeth (Prashant Murali) and son. Her life takes a dark turn when she receives a threatening call from a stranger who knows a hidden secret from her past. As she starts seeing the blackmailer around, Nisha’s husband decides to report the case to the police, leading Sub Inspector Ajith (Maqbool Salman) to take on the investigation. With each twist, secrets from Nisha’s past and present come to light, connecting the pieces of a dark mystery.

Highlights: Agathokakological

❤️ Leona Lishoy shines in her role, delivering a powerful performance that adds depth to her character’s journey.
❤️ Maqbool Salman impresses as the intense, dedicated cop, adding strength to the film’s emotional undertone.
❌ The story becomes predictable, with twists that lack suspense, leaving thriller fans wanting more.
❌ Weak direction and sluggish pacing reduce the movie’s impact, making some scenes feel unnecessarily stretched.

Viswam: An Outdated Attempt at Action and Comedy

Platform: Amazon Prime Video
Director: Sreenu Vaitla
Cast: Gopichand, Kavya Thapar, Jishu Sengupta, Sunil, Vennela Kishore

Plot Synopsis: Viswam

Viswam follows Gopi (Gopichand), a fierce and loyal man determined to defend his father’s name, who soon finds himself caught up in a web of terrorism, political schemes, and random comedy. The film starts with a terrorist threat but quickly shifts gears, introducing a flood of subplots involving political corruption, romantic tropes, and slapstick humour. Meanwhile, Gopi forms a romantic connection with Samaira (Kavya Thapar), a stylist with dubious motives who eventually turns good after he saves her.

Amidst the chaos, the terror threat resurfaces only occasionally, adding confusion rather than suspense. The film tries to balance humour, action, and emotion, but the blend falls short, feeling scattered and outdated.

Highlights: Viswam

❤️ Vennela Kishore shines in parts with his comic timing, despite limited support from the script.
❌ Overloaded with subplots, the narrative becomes tedious and difficult to follow.
❌ Predictable character arcs and dated tropes make the movie feel stretched and redundant.

Viswam tries to deliver an entertaining mix but fails to keep the viewer engaged with its meandering storyline and worn-out humour. For those who prefer something fresh, it might be best to skip this one. Now streaming on Amazon Prime Video.

Yudhra: No Thrills, Only Kills

Platform: Amazon Prime Video
Director: Ravi Udyawar
Cast: Siddhant Chaturvedi, Malavika Mohanan, Gajraj Rao, Ram Kapoor, Raghav Juyal

Plot Synopsis: Yudhra

Yudhra follows a young, battle-ready hero (Siddhant Chaturvedi), shaped by violence from birth. Raised without parents, he grows up fighting anger issues and is trained by his father’s allies, Kartik (Gajraj Rao) and Rahman (Ram Kapoor), to complete his father’s mission. Alongside Rahman’s daughter, Nikhat (Malavika Mohanan), Yudhra sets out to infiltrate a drug cartel led by the ruthless Firoz (Raj Arjun) and his erratic son (Raghav Juyal).

As secrets emerge, Yudhra’s battle intensifies, but the emotional connections fail to resonate.

Highlights: Yudhra

❤️ Siddhant Chaturvedi impresses with his intense performance, bringing both physicality and style to his role.
❌ The story relies heavily on predictable action scenes, lacking suspense and depth.
❌ The romance and emotional elements feel shallow, reducing the impact of the characters’ journey.

Yudhra is a stylish actioner with potential but falls short on emotional depth and originality. If you’re in the mood for action without expecting too much plot, it’s streaming now on Amazon Prime Video (Rent).

Sattam En Kayil: A One-Night Thriller with Unbelievable Twists

Platform: Amazon Prime Video
Director: Chachhi
Cast: Sathish, Pavel Navageethan, Ajay Raj, Venba, Vidya Pradeep

Plot Synopsis: Sattam En Kayil

In Sattam En Kayil, a suspenseful thriller unfolds over a single foggy night in Yercaud. Gowtham (Sathish), a timid man with a stammer, accidentally kills a motorcyclist and hides the body in his car trunk. When he gets stopped at a police checkpoint, he pretends to be drunk to avoid suspicion.

Things spiral out of control as Gowtham is taken into custody, only to discover that the motorcyclist was already a wanted man. Now he must navigate between two power-hungry cops, Inspector Basha (Pavel Navageethan) and Nagaraj (Ajay Raj), to keep his deadly secret under wraps.

Highlights: Sattam En Kayil

❤️ Sathish impresses as Gowtham, portraying nervousness and gradual confidence with skill.
❤️ Pavel Navageethan and Ajay Raj’s characters bring depth with their intense rivalry, adding excitement to the narrative.
❌ The first half feels slow and somewhat scattered, though the film gains pace in the second half.
❌ Logical flaws, like questionable decisions by Gowtham, weaken the plot’s believability.

In Sattam En Kayil, a strong second half with unexpected twists makes up for a slow start and some predictable elements. If you’re up for a suspense-filled ride, give it a watch on Amazon Prime Video!

The most entertaining theatre release this week: Read Lucky Baskhar review here

Lucky Baskhar: Why it’s the Best From Venky Atluri

If I were to define Lucky Baskhar in one word, it would be “cathartic.”  Cathartic means nothing but that moment where you say, “My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius…” Lucky Baskhar follows the same path—the story of a middle-class bank employee who can’t even afford three pav bhajis from the streets of Mumbai, who becomes a billionaire in a couple of years. It’s not a one-man-show movie like Sivaji the Boss or Padayappa; rather, the credit must be shared between the team: Venky Atluri, Dulquer Salmaan, Nimish Ravi, and G.V. Prakash.

Title Card: Lucky Baskhar

A High Octane Narrative by Venky Atluri

Honestly speaking, I don’t like preachy movies, so I was a little hesitant about this Venky Atluri venture. I expected it to be a better version of Vijay Devarakonda and Parasuram’s Family Star.

Family Star Trailer

However, Venky surprised me with a well-balanced narrative filled with twists and turns. The thriller shade of the movie overpowered its middle-class hero glorification and preachy dialogues. Even the way he portrays some harsh truths is so classy and straight to the point—for example, dialogues like “I am not bad; I’m rich.”

Venky Atluri introduce his scenes like it’s from a pressure pump, building up tension in the audience and then with a twist, a sudden release—again, repeating this throughout the script until the climax. Normally, this pattern could make you bored, and by the climax, people might not feel the impact since they may start predicting things. But here, Venky shows brilliance in scripting; he covers up Baskhar’s cunningness with family drama and emotions so that the script ensures the audience won’t be skeptical about Baskhar’s actions. When Baskhar says, “It’s just begun,” he really means it. The second half shifts into top gear with family sentiments, thrills, emotions, and suspense.

A Con Thriller for Family Audience

So overall, Venky Atluri’s script is more like a Con thriller, with every other element acting as a cover-up. Another point I like about the script is that money laundering or stock market scams are not that easy to comprehend for a layman unless you are a fan of web series like Scam.

Scam 1992 Trailer

Here, Venky cleverly adds some overlapping shots where supporting characters explain things for you, so Baskhar’s sly moves become comprehensible even for those unfamiliar with the nuances of finance.

Dulquer Salmaan: Heart of the Film

It’s hard to imagine any other actor ( from Tollywood) pulling off this role with the ease Dulquer Salmaan does. His “boy-next-door” charm and physique make him a relatable character. DQ’s biggest plus is his “boy-next-door” look and physique.

Dulquer’s recent characters from TollyWood

His chest or arms aren’t like balloons, and he doesn’t have the headweight of a star. When he is humiliated, crying, we see a helpless middle-class family man, someone we know.

There’s a shot where he cries in the bathroom after almost losing everything—his dignity, his hope, his vehicle—and then switches with a smile. His ability to switch between helplessness and resilience ensures we empathise with his character. Venky’s objective of coating cunningness with innocence and justifying fraudulence with helplessness succeeds due to Dulquer’s screen presence and ease of acting.

Another big plus of Dulquer is he’s a great narrator. The movie progresses with DQ breaking the fourth wall and narrating, which is the icing on the cake.

Nimish Ravi’s Authentic Cinematic World

Cinematographer Nimish Ravi brilliantly captures the essence of 1990s Mumbai. Nowhere does the setting feel artificial, with the grey walls, crowded streets, and vada pav stalls giving an authentic backdrop.

Scene from Lucky Baskhar

In a period drama, the biggest challenge is making the setting believable. Nimish & Art team did a decent job here. It’s 1990s Mumbai, not because of some film posters but because of Nimish Ravi and art director Banglan (the art director of DQ’s Kurup).

G.V. Prakash Kumar’s Score – The Magic Touch

Pick any high or low moment in the film—when Baskhar faces an insult from a moneylender, or when he does a ₹6 million shopping spree and walks in slow motion—GVP makes sure you don’t have time to think about logic; just enjoy the magic on screen with your ears open. :). 

GVP’s music keeps viewers entranced, amplifying the emotional highs and lows without letting them pause to question or be a detective to predict what’s next.

A Strong Role for Meenakshi Chaudhary

When it comes to the beautiful Meenakshi Chaudhary, I’m personally so happy to see her in a prominent role rather than roles where she’s just serving coffee to the hero or dancing with some uncles. 

Ted talk: Dr Meenakshi Chaudhary

Her character, Sumathi, is strong, independent, and inspiring. It was well-written, and there are many scenes where she scores as an emotional anchor for Baskhar.

A Story That Resonates with the Middle-Class Dreams

Lucky Baskhar touches every middle-class man out there, and Venky successfully sells his dreams to that set audience. Overnight success with minimal consequence and a happy ending—what else does an average viewer want for satisfaction, at least for a day?

Image credits: @djmn_drawing

I appreciate how Venky shifts the perspective from “Fortune comes with risk” to “Fortune sustains when you know where to stop.” Most fortunes fall when people overestimate luck as skill.

Final Thoughts

In a world where only 2 million Indians (out of 1.428 Billion) belong to the high-income group (according to a 2021 Research report), Lucky Baskhar is bound to be a blockbuster.

It serves as a catharsis for everyone dreaming of overnight fortunes. Considering director Venky Atluri’s previous flicks like Vaathi or Rang De, in my opinion, Lucky Baskhar is the best.

Check out this week’s OTT releases here

Saripodhaa Sanivaaram: Vigilante or Vendetta?

What I like most about Trivikram Srinivas is how he connects mythological stories with mass masala movies. He often places his heroes in the roles of Vishnu, Rama, or Krishna, making them feel like incarnations of these divine figures. In Saripodhaa Sanivaaram, Vivek Athreya followed a similar approach.

Saripodhaa Sanivaaram Title card

Have you heard the story of Narakasura?

Narakasura was a powerful and evil demon king, the son of Bhudevi (Mother Earth) and Varaha, an avatar of Lord Vishnu. Despite his divine origins, Narakasura was notorious for his wickedness and cruelty. He ruled the kingdom of Pragjyotisha, where he terrorized people and killed many innocents.

His power and arrogance grew so immense that even the heavens were disturbed by his actions.

Finally, Lord Krishna decided to fight Narakasura. However, Narakasura had a boon that only his mother could kill him. Krishna, knowing this, allowed Satyabhama, who was an incarnation of Bhudevi, to take the lead in the battle.

Plot: Saripodhaa Sanivaaram

Saripodhaa Sanivaaram begins with this story, and throughout the movie, Naani keeps referring to it. In a way, S. J. Suriyah represents a modern-day Narakasura, Sokulapalam is a modern-day Pragjyotisha, and Surya and his girlfriend Charulatha can be seen as Krishna and Satyabhama.

Nani vs S J Suriyah Face Off from Sanivaaram

But there is one difference, Krishna empowers others to take action against injustice but Suriya is different, when he witnesses injustice, he does not let it go.

Why You Should Try This Movie

This movie is packed with all the elements that make for commercial success in Tollywood and Kollywood: mother sentiment, father sentiment, sister sentiment, and a hero saving a community from oppression or vigilantism. A hero introduction setup where he fights against injustice. You’ll experience intense cat-and-mouse games between the villain and the hero.

Nani & Priyanka Mohan

But what’s most impressive is that Vivek Athreya proves you don’t need to rely on showing the actress’s navel, a mass item song, or a foreign set song to create a mass action flick. Even though it’s a mass entertainer, Vivek Athreya keeps a minimalist approach, ensuring that you won’t get bored with cliches. In one line, Saripodhaa Sanivaaram is a middle-class Chathrapathi or a Vikramarkudu on a low budget.

A Domino Game and Athreya’s 6 Chapters

I feel like Vivek Athreya, as a writer, took inspiration from films like Tamil Maaveran and various Hollywood movies. He segmented Saripodhaa Sanivaaram into six chapters: the prologue, the turn, the knot, the crossroads, hide and seek, and redemption. It’s almost as if Vivek Athreya is trolling mass-action fans, sarcastically asking us, ee formula Saripodhaa? (Isn’t that enough?).

S J Suriyah as C I Daya

He established Suriyah (Nani) with subplots, Charulatha (Priyanka Mohan) with an open-ended past, and Daya (S J Suriyah) laced with dark humour and a dysfunctional family plot, all of which set the stage for a fire show.

The way Vivek wrote the script is like a domino effect—each event triggers the next, and each character drives an event. It’s beautiful to witness the script evolve so rhythmically.

Performances & Cast

When it comes to performances, Abhirami’s portrayal of the mother was deeply touching and reminded me of Simran in Kannathil Muthamittal, especially those moments at the beach, and some elements from  Bhanupriya of Chathrapathi.

Sai Kumar, the millennium’s angry young man, plays a father struggling to pacify his angry young son. There wasn’t much for a veteran like Sai Kumar to do, aside from a few bass voice narrations.

Nani as Suriyah

S. J. Suriyah and Nani played their characters brilliantly, convincingly portraying their utterly chaotic and distressed lives. Both are going through pain triggered by siblings—one suffering because of his brother, the other troubled by his sister.

Murli Sharma and Ajay Ghosh’s characters were icing on the cake with the perfect touch of humour to the film with their mannerisms and timing.

S J SUriyah speech at Saripodhaa Sanivaaram pre-release event

However, Priyanka Mohan’s character didn’t quite convince me. As S. J. Suriyah mentioned during the pre-release event of Saripodhaa Sanivaaram, Priyanka was too cute even as a constable. Her makeup, costume, and body language felt more like a hero’s pillion rider. I wish she had played a more prominent role, similar to what we see in the Narakasura story.

Jakes Bejoy: The Master of Elevation

Last but not least, Jakes Bejoy is the one who ensures you won’t dig too much on logic. Instead, you’re completely sucked into Athreya’s world, where no poor man uses social media or mobile cameras. For every question that pops into your head, Vivek’s writing will push you to another event, and Jakes Bejoy’s BGM will scream loud, and shut your curious mind, keeping you on track.

Saripodhu Ee Sanivaram

Finally, it’s technically a Vivek Athreya vigilante story, but I believe it’s actually a Vivek Athreya revenge story—a revenge against the Telugu audience who made his Ante Sundaraniki a flop. Now, he’s screaming loud to you: Saripodhaa Ee Sanivaram! (Is this Saturday enough??) I believe people are saying a big yes! Ee saari assalu bore kottaledhu.

Related Articles

Mr. Bachchan: More Songs, Less Raid

In one of his interviews, Ravi Teja mentioned that some directors had already approached him for the Raid remake, but he declined since it doesn’t fit within his comfort zone (mass-masala-glamour). However, when Harish Shankar proposed Mr.Bachchan, he readily agreed because Harish Shankar’s remakes are different. I completely agree with this, and that’s exactly what I felt when I watched Gaddalakonda Ganesh and Mr. Bachchan. Harish Shankar will go to any extent to entertain with his masala-action dramas.

Mr.Bachchan Title Card
Mr.Bachchan Title Card

The thing with a remake movie is, when you know what’s coming yet still find yourself drawn to the narrative, then it’s a successful remake. And that’s the Harish Shankar formula. Let’s take the example of Dabangg and Pawan Kalyan’s Gabbar Singh. Who would have expected that Antakshari event with rowdies at the police station?

Gabbar Singh Antakshari Scene

The Grandeur Plot

In Mr. Bachchan, Ravi Teja plays a tax official who raids the house of a powerful and wealthy man and gets suspended from the department. The entire first half has him romancing the heroine and enjoying his suspension period. In the second half, his suspension is repealed, and he’s assigned to conduct a raid at another ruthless, powerful man’s home.

Ravi teja Title Card: Mr. bachchan
Ravi teja Title Card: Mr. bachchan

Raid (2018) vs. Mr.Bachchan (2024)

In the original movie Raid by Rajkumar Gupta, there’s minimal setup before the raid. We learn that Ajay Devgn has been receiving information from an anonymous source about hidden wealth, and he keeps it all secret, even from his staff, because he (correctly) doesn’t trust them.

Raid Trailer

What I like most about Raid is that it manages to be thrilling without being stressful. But in Mr. Bachchan, everything is grand—4-5 songs, tonnes of junior artists and their melodrama, comedians popping up like those random pineapple pieces in a spicy biryani.

Bhagyashri, Harish Shankar’s Lucky Star

Despite its niggles, clichéd templates, and outdated comedy of nearly two and a half hours, Mr. Bachan might entertain the regular Telugu movie audience, who doesn’t have much in the way of expectations or deep thoughts.

For example, you shouldn’t ask questions like how a 1980s couple from a village dreams up a song in Switzerland, or why the camera angles focus more on the heroine’s curves than her face, or why the ruthless villain and his entire gang are helpless against an average man without even a gun.

It’s a director’s film that draws steamy performances from both Bhagyashri Borse and Ravi Teja, and that’s the biggest highlight of the film. Honestly, it’s more Bhagyashri’s film than Ravi Teja’s.

Ravi Teja – Harish Shankar Mass Elements

What makes the difference in such an old-type story is the spicy cooking by Harish Shankar. He knows the recipe well. More than Ravi Teja, it’s Bhagyashri Borse who got the whistles. There are certain antics of Ravi Teja—like wrapping his arms around belly curves, clasping fat tissues, cuddling earlobes and neck—which could appear like ‘overacting’ if not handled well by the director. But Harish Shankar managed those areas really well with his camera angles and aesthetic direction skills.

Song Shot from Mr.Bachchan
Song Shot from Mr.Bachchan

He used them excellently to bring out hilariously entertaining episodes from the central characters, and even threw in retro Bollywood songs in the first half.

Why you should try Mr.Bachchan

  1. Sathya and his comedy track with Sachin Khedekar
  2. A surprise cameo in the second half
  3. The climax twists and fights
  4. Bhagyashri and her cuteness-overloaded songs
  5. Retro song recording sections—probably the best comedy track of the film
  6. Reference episodes to Amitabh Bachchan movies
  7. The only hope for Ravi Teja, he badly needs a hit, let’s support 🙂

“Mr. Bachan, the only hope”—I believe this title fits Ravi Teja perfectly. After multiple flops, his only hope is in Harish Shankar, and I believe this will end up as an average grosser. One thing is sure: Bhagyashri is going to be the next Sreeleela of Tollywood.

Related Articles.

Four Types Of Love: 8 movies

Animal Explained: Dissecting the Hidden Philosphies

From Seven Samurai to SALAAR: Ethical Combat Dramas

Aattam, Who Is The Culprit: Ending Explained

Aattam Movie explained and find the culprit
Refer to this image for a better reading experience.

If you ask me, which is the brilliant Malayalam film from the 2024 first quarter, I would say it’s Aattam. Aattam is a 2024 Malayalam suspense chamber drama. Penned by debutant director Anand Ekarshi, Aattam navigates through the politics of gender dynamics, patriarchy, situational morality & selfishness in humans, within a theatrical setting. If you have seen this movie, most viewers ask a question: Who is the culprit in Aattam. Let me explain the layers of Aattam first, and if you are impatient, the answer is Sudheer.

Plot Overview

Aattam is a thriller of accusation and betrayal set against the backdrop of a theatre troupe. The plot circles around Anjali, the group’s only female actor, levelling charges of sexual harassment against a newly joined popular movie star in their team.

A scene from Aattam
A scene from Aattam

What starts as a straightforward allegation soon spirals into a complex web of deceit, manipulation, and shifting loyalties, especially when the proposal of a European tour throws the troupe into moral disarray.

The narrative cleverly employs a classic whodunit structure, yet the way it unveils the innate biases and hypocrisy of its characters is what makes it interesting.

How Aanand, wrote each character is truly admirable; for example, the character Aji (the eldest among them): Aanand constructed the character through micro interactions (mentioning phone calls, his mannerisms, etc).

A scene from Aattam
Transformation scenes of Aji from Aattam

At the same time, Aji’s transformation didn’t go well (someone who doesn’t care about dying suddenly willing to compromise on himself so that he can go to Europe is a bit forced, in my opinion). And all this was just so that he could say what he said at the end.

Finding The Culprit & Theme of Aattam #Whodunnit  

Aattam is not about Whodunnit; by the end of the film, if you are just curious to know Whodunnit, then I would say this film is not for you. This film is not about the sinner; rather, it’s about the sin.

It’s like wondering if Teddy Daniels in Shutter Island chooses to live in a lie or faces the truth in the end. The real question isn’t what reality he picks. It’s about Teddy reaching a point where he prefers peace over constant torment, regardless of whether his world is real or made up. So, he makes a choice that might lead him to a lobotomy, showing he’d rather forget than live with the pain.

A scene from Shutter Island
A scene from Shutter Island

The movie is sprinkled with so many minor flaws in human interactions, be they judgmental, generalisation based on experience, selfishness, hypocrisy, vigilantism, patriarchal mindset, social influence, arrogance, or demeaning others.

A scene from Aattam
A scene from Aattam

Even in the way he shows patriarchal ideologies in all layers of society, for example, there is a scene where a politician requests Madan’s vote, saying, Come and vote for me with the same finger that you have voted for my father.

By the end, when Anjali says: “നീ ആരാണെന്ന് എനിക്കറിയണ്ട. നീയും ആ 11 പേരും തമ്മിൽ ഇന്നെനിക്ക് ഒരു വ്യത്യാസവുമില്ല”

Climax scene from Aattam
Climax scene from Aattam

The director Anand Ekarshi summarises the movie there. But if you are curious to find the culprit from Aattam, I will help you. Scroll down straght to the last sub-heading.

12 Angry Men v/s Aattam

Aattam is very similar to the classic 12 Angry Men, be it the style, theme, and narration. It’s evident that Aanand Ekarshi is highly inspired by 12 Angry Men.

The film 12 Angry Men exemplifies many social psychology theories. This tense, compelling film, features a group of jurors who must decide the guilt or innocence of the accused.

12 Angry men scene
12 Angry Men

Initially, eleven of the twelve jurors vote guilty. Gradually, through heated discussion, the jurors are swayed to a not-guilty decision. Upon examination, the film highlights social psychology theories in areas of conformity, attitude change, and group processes.

Don’t you think it’s the same structure that Anand is following here?

When the inverter stops working, everyone leaves the house and steps outside due to the heat. Later, when it starts to rain, everyone rushes inside the house. These 2 scenes are one of the few scenes in which background music can be heard.

I think the director Anand Ekarshi wants to emphasise these 2 scenes, to show how we change our stance depending on the situation. The whole team was sure about throwing out Shajon’s character initially, but when the London Trip was introduced, everyone changed their stance.

Climax scene from 12 angry men movie
A scene from 12 Angry Men

A similar scene you can see from 12 Angry Men, where they open the windows because it’s too hot inside, and they open up the windows.

This shows that we humans change our stands as per our needs. This is where, I thought it would have been great if there were a couple of women who initially stood with Anjali and then turned their backs after the European trip offer came, It would better show that most people are hypocrites, not just men.

Attitude Change and Persuasion in the First Half

The central route to persuasion is all about logic and reason. It’s where you convince someone by using strong arguments, evidence, and facts to back up your position.

In the first half, you can see that Madan, Sijin, Jolly and Santosh are doing this.

For example, Sijin asks Madan: “What exactly did she tell you”, or Jolly asks: “So it happened not when she was awake”

Peripheral v/s Central persuasion from AATTAM
Peripheral v/s Central persuasion

The peripheral route of persuasion is the opposite of the central route. It’s a shortcut to influencing someone, relying on indirect cues and associations rather than strong arguments.

It targets our emotions and biases, and doesn’t require much effort from the audience to process. Vinay, Aji, Nandan, Sudheer, and Selvan are following this route.

For example when Nandan says: “He will do it, he always shares bawdy jokes”. or Selvan says: ” A sober mind wouldn’t do such things, it happened becuase they were drunk”. Through the use of non-factual, environmental cues, the sick gentleman utilises the peripheral route to persuasion.

Another important factor is Social loafing. It describes a situation where people exert less effort when working in a group compared to working alone. It’s like slacking off a bit because you think others will pick up the slack.

Prashanth and Jolly are in that stage, where they are slacking off with excuses.

And by the end of the first half, you can see group polarisation.

Imagine you and your friends are discussing a movie. Some might initially like it a little, some might be neutral, and a few might dislike it. Through discussion, those who liked it a little might become more enthusiastic, and those who disliked it might become even more critical. This is group polarisation.

Vinay brilliantly polarised everyone in one direction, by the end of the first half.

Moral Disengagement in The Second Half

Throughout Aattam, you are going to witness a few complexities in human behaviours like Moral Disengagement and Hypocrisy.

What is moral disengagement?

Moral disengagement is basically a fancy way of saying someone talks themselves into believing ethical rules don’t apply to them in a specific situation. It’s a psychological process that lets people act unethically without feeling bad about it.

Moral Disengagement from AATTAM
Moral Disengagement

Moral justification: Coming up with reasons why their actions are good, even if they aren’t. In Aattam, how conveniently the characters brought different reasons after they got to know about the European trip.

Observe how Selvan, Madan, Aji and Jolly. For instance, Jolly, the silent guy in the first half is aggressive and says “Just swallow the story in the whole”.

Moral Disengagement from AATTAM

Euphemistic labelling: Using nicer words to downplay the seriousness of their actions. For example when Madan talks about “Tactile Halluccination” he is trying to nullify her arguments in a sweeter way compared to Santhosh and Sijin.

Discrediting the victim: This involves downplaying the harm caused to the victim or portraying them as deserving of the negative consequences.

For example, Selvan saying about Anjali’s drinking habit, Prashant talking about her relationship with a married man, Sijin talking about her relationship, even addressing her as “Set-up”.

Disregarding or minimising consequences: This involves downplaying the negative outcomes of the action. For example, Vinay saying Anjali ” No one did anything to you, let’s believe it like that.”

I really love that scene where Anjali asked the question to vinay: “If it’s not Hari, who was it? , no one raised this question”. this is where the brilliance of the script, in the beginning, everyone was talking about the punishments, but when they realised it’s not Hari and one among them, they conviniently went through the moral disengagement and forgot the whodunnit part.

Who Is The Actual Culprit: Aattam Ending Explained

If you really want a culprit, let me share some thoughts:

In the final scene of the movie, in Anjali’s drama, the culprit confesses while Anjali is holding a yellow cloth. There is only one character in the whole movie who is wearing a yellow dress. Is that the culprit? 

That’s not a rational finding, right?

Okay, one more theory:

Anjali said, there was an intense perfume smell. Guys who fell in the pool won’t have that intense smell.

Jolly, Sudheer, Prashanth and Vinay were the people who didn’t fall in the pool.

Let’s eliminate Vinay, since, he is her lover. Jolly was busy with his video call and was disturbed, so let’s eliminate him.

Now either it should be Prashanth or Sudheer. Sudheer and Prashanth are the ones who got disturbed while hearing this, and went out for smoking.

I believe it’s Sudheer. WHY?

During that party, Sudheer was disturbed by seeing Anjali’s cleavage, that disturbance can be an arousal as well. Sudheer tried to hide the evidence in the first half, without any rationality. Near to the climax, while Jolly is showing the screenshot to others, Sudheer acts like he is seeing the first time. He was in a hurry to establish Hari as the culprit. He consistently avoided involving the police.

Sudheer's key scenes from Aattam which proves that he is the culprit of Aattam
Sudheer’s key scenes from Aattam

Being a smoker, Sudheer knew that Hari kept cigarettes in his car. He likely stole the car keys before the other person retrieved them.

Additionally, Sudheer watched pornography just before the incident. that was revealed later. Madan is asking why Nandhan went to Shajitha’s room, if we place Sudheer in Nandhan’s place, we have an answer: Sudheer might have gone there to see his wife and might have seen Anjali.

So, I believe it’s Sudheer. But let me remind you that the essence of film is not #Whodunnit

“നീ ആരാണെന്ന് എനിക്കറിയണ്ട. നീയും ആ 11 പേരും തമ്മിൽ ഇന്നെനിക്ക് ഒരു വ്യത്യാസവുമില്ല” 👌 { “I don’t need to know who you are. You and those 11 people are all the same to me today.” – Anjali }

Read more movie reviews and analysis here.

Animal Explained: Dissecting the Hidden Philosphies and Patriarchal Ideologies

Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s Animal is streaming on Netflix with 3 hours and 24 minutes of adrenaline pumps. This is not a review, but rather an analysis of the propaganda art and politics of Animal. So, this blog contains spoilers, and if you haven’t watched it yet, skip this.

After Arjun Reddy (2017) and Kabir Singh (2019), two films about a sexually desperate misogynistic doctor with anger issues and Preeti obsession, director Sandeep Reddy Vanga returns with Animal. This time, it’s about a toxic patriarchal chain-smoking engineer obsessed with his father.

Animal movie explained
Animal Movie Poster

The crux of the story is a son protecting his father from animals in an animal park. Despite the script being imbued with his palaeolithic view of human instincts, Sandeep Reddy Vanga managed to infuse it with high adrenaline action, music, and a bloodbath. In essence, the hero is a carnivorous animal in human form, devoid of sin, vision, or empathy, driven only by instincts.

I thoroughly enjoyed the film, although I disagree with a few of Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s perspectives. This film is a commendable mass entertainer.

How Sandeep Ignites the Adrenaline Rush With Animal

Sandeep Reddy Vanga brilliantly incorporates elements that have recently succeeded in commercial movies. Bringing in a weapon dealer, adding a massive gunfight scene, and retro songs like Roja, Punjabi DJ songs & Jamal Jamaloo, created high moments in theatres and on Instagram as well.

The cold-blooded revenge arc, fatherly sentiments, and nationalism (the weapons are made in India scenes) are well-placed. Surprises, such as the bystander-turned-traitor twists and the double climax, the 2-hour (so-called) street fight in the end (a reminiscent of Thallumala) the list is long. The high-adrenaline music is another highlight. Kudos to the long list of music directors from Harshavardhan Rameshwar, Jaani, Vishal Mishra, Shreyas Puranik, Manan Bhardwaj to last but not least: A. R. Rahman.

Forgot to add, the climax scene, inspired by Rolex, is particularly notable. Fans of Leo, Jawan, Pathan, and Arjun Reddy will find Animal a high-adrenaline theatre experience.

Animal’s Anthropology Class & Thrills from the Start

The movie begins with a narration, swiftly moving to a school episode of Ranvijay (Ranbir Kapoor) showcasing his love for his father. One of my favourite scenes follows, filled with A.R. Rahman’s Roja background score, where Ranvijay is now a college boy. The film transitions seamlessly to love at first sight.

Sandeep Reddy Vanga acts like an anthropologist, sharing perspectives on the evolution of poetry. These insights could be used to promote a whey protein brand or a fitness centre. He then progresses Ranvijay’s character arc to highlight his prejudiced and narcissistic nature.

Sandeep Reddy & His Art of Crafting a Predatory Protagonist

Sandeep Reddy Vanga meticulously wrote this character. Ranvijay cries only once in the entire movie. He never shows his vulnerabilities; even when he informs his sister about her husband’s death, he immediately consoles her by suggesting a remarriage. He consoles his wife by stating that happiness is a choice, and there’s a scene where he enjoys biryani made from human flesh (though Sandeep Reddy Vanga doesn’t explicitly show this). With all these elements, Sandeep tells you how umpathetic Ranjvijay is.

I appreciate Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s meticulous crafting of dialogues for Ranbir Kapoor. Ranbir’s dialogues always reflect an animal mindset, like his comments on business expansion or his various lectures. When Ranbir talks about patience and his fights with schoolmates, it reminds me of predators on Animal Planet. Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s portrayal of his hero as a tiger is contrasted with a more dog-like loyalty, treating others as subservient. Sandeep Reddy Vanga has a knack for highlighting character flaws, like Ranvijay’s.

The Subservient Female Roles in Animal Explained

Sandeep Reddy Vanga doesn’t give much importance to female characters like Geethanali, Zoya, or even Reet. They are portrayed as subservient to their male counterparts. Geethanali’s quick fall in love with Ranvijay, perhaps influenced by watching Arjun Reddy, is an example of this. Similarly, Zoya is depicted as submissive to Ranbir’s character. What is most disturbing is that Zoya is even ready to lick his feet for his love.

Rashmika Mandanna & Ranbir Kapoor from Animal

Unfortunately, Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s skill seems solely invested in building the character of Ranvijay. When it comes to the character arc, it only moves in one direction, continually ascending. I believe actions should have consequences, but nothing Ranvijay does in Animal seems to have any.

Sandeep’s Reply for Concerns Around Sexuality, Violence, and Gender Equality

Sandeep Reddy Vanga also tries to counter criticisms of male chauvinism. He addresses consent by having Ranvijay touch Geethanali’s feet and give a lecture on the importance of women in the Paleolithic era.

Ranbir kapoor and Rashmika Mandanna from Animal
Ranbir kapoor and Rashmika Mandanna from Animal

If there’s a problem with him slapping her, this time let her slap him. If there are issues with domination and masculinity, let her come to his home, kiss him in front of everyone, and let him praise her physique. He addresses body shaming by giving a spiritual lesson on pubic hair.

If there’s a problem with adult content and gory scenes, let’s have a three-hour blood bath with nudity and discussions of sexual fantasies.

What I really like is the idea of recording the moanings of their first lovemaking and using it to calm his angry wife, that was truly a wow! what an idea moment 🙂 .

So, in simple words, this movie entertains the majority with ease. I was expecting a Tarantino style but got an ultra-mode RGV style. Raw violence, sex, and obsession await you in this movie, sprinkled with a few good father-son sentiments.

The climax scene, with two sons fighting for their father’s honour and love, battling with emotions, and a background song echoing their family connection, made the whole theatre dark and silent without any mobile screen light or murmurs. That’s the power of bringing raw emotions to the screen.

From Ranbir to Tripti Dimri: Explaining Performances from Animal

Ranbir Kapoor, Bobby Deol, Rashmika Mandanna and Anil Kapoor from the Animal movie
Ranbir Kapoor, Bobby Deol, Rashmika Mandanna and Anil Kapoor from the Animal movie.

Regarding performances, Ranbir Kapoor establishes himself as a superstar with Animal. Sandeep Reddy Vanga did justice to Bobby Deol fans, though I expected more from Bobby Deol. My surprise was Tripti Dimri, whose screen presence was mind-blowing despite limited screen time. Charu Singh and Anil Kapoor did their parts as Ranbir’s parents with ease. Saurabh Sachdeva delivered a killing performance as Bobby Deol’s brother, especially in the climax. Rashmika gave a decent performance, possibly her best since Kirik Party

Why is it Animal ? Animal Explained

Let me explain my views on why the film is called Animal by Sandeep Reddy.

The film explores the more primal, instinctual aspects of human nature, as shown in how Ranbir celebrates his heart surgery and how Abrar releases his pain of loss. In Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s Animal park, the lead male characters operate based on the pleasure principle, seeking immediate gratification. The climax fight is reminiscent of the survival of the fittest theory, living in a world where the law of nature prevails.

In this movie, after Papa, SWASTIK is the most highlighted word. It’s their family business, indicating a blend of traditional values and a darker quest for power (Nazi approach).

The tagline of Swastik, “Power, Progress & Victory”, is repeated by Ranvijay during his oath of vengeance. As per psychologist Carl Jung’s concept of the shadow, this tagline could be seen as manifestations of Ranvijay’s shadow, where his animalistic traits (aggression, dominance, the pursuit of power) are embraced and externalised as his personal and corporate ethos.

Animal & Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s Propaganda Art

Regarding opinions, my friend argued,

How conveniently do we forget that Scorsese used slow-motion and rousing soundtracks for despicable characters in ‘Goodfellas’ and ‘Casino’, and when Sandeep Reddy Vanga does an extreme Indian version of that, it’s suddenly ‘glorification’?

Robert De Niro & Martin Scorsese
Robert De Niro & Martin Scorsese

As a die-hard fan of Scorses, I feel Martin Scorsese never portrayed Travis Bickle or Jimmy Conway as heroes, nor did he justify their actions. His characters dealt with consequences, unlike in Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s Ranvijay. This is where Sandeep Reddy Vanga falls short as a responsible artist. I believe he is obsessed with certain ideologies and celebrates and promotes them through his movies. Scorsese’s Raging Bull highlighted male insecurity in 1980. Can we expect such a film from Sandeep Reddy Vanga?

Toxic masculinity is a propaganda tool for promoting patriarchal beliefs. Ranvijay’s words to his sister about killing any of her choices he dislikes, and his actions as a school kid stepping in with a gun to protect his sister, and delivering a lecture to his father suggest a patriarchal mindset. That’s where he fails to responsibly handle his craft.

Read about the Yadhoom philosophy & Sriram Raghavan’s Merry chritmas here.

From Seven Samurai to SALAAR: Ethical Combat Dramas

SALAAR is available on Netflix now. Before writing about Salaar, let me tell you: My all-time favourite Ethical Combat Dramas are Seven Samurai and ‘Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon’ (2000). By the way, it’s a new genre that I’ve discovered. 😃 Allow me to explain.

SALAAR poster from Netflix
Salaar on Netflix

What Are Ethical Combat Dramas

These kinds of movies explore complex ethical and moral questions, often set within a historical or cultural context. They dive into themes of honour, justice, and the human conditions.

Central to these movies is the element of combat, whether it’s the swordplay of samurai films or the martial arts in movies like ‘Crouching Tiger,’ or even the Gatling gun action seen in post-‘Kaithi’ Indian cinema. Each film employs intense drama to explore its themes and develop its characters.

The drama often unfolds in historical or fantastical settings, adding depth and a sense of grandeur. Another common feature is their epic scope, evident in their narrative scale, the depth of their themes, or their visual magnificence.

Now, SALAAR, knowingly or unknowingly, belongs to this category of Ethical Combat Drama.

Why Seven Samurai Is a Perfect Ethical Combat Drama

Before diving into SALAAR, let me share why Seven Samurai and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon are my favourites in the Ethical Combat Drama genre.

Seven Samurai Title Card
Seven Samurai Title Card

I’ll focus on Seven Samurai, as it’s more widely recognised compared to Crouching Tiger. The portrayal of protagonists in this film goes beyond them being merely skilled warriors; they are depicted as complex characters, each with their own moral compass and emotional struggles. This depth elevates the film above a typical action drama.

Contrast and Juxtaposition

Akira Kurosawa, the director, masterfully uses contrast to highlight the heroes’ qualities. For example, the samurai’s skills and moral codes are often juxtaposed against the bandits’ brutality or the villagers’ fear and helplessness. This stark contrast not only showcases the samurai as protectors but also as warriors of virtue.

A Scene from Seven Samurai
A Scene from Seven Samurai

Dynamic Action Sequences

Kurosawa’s dynamic and innovative action sequences, particularly in fight scenes, effectively showcase the samurai’s skills and bravery. The choreography, camera work, and pacing all contribute to portraying these characters as larger than life.

Heroic Actions in Introduction Scenes

A powerful narrative technique Kurosawa employs is introducing a character in a moment of heroism. This approach establishes their role and capabilities within the story efficiently, without relying heavily on dialogue or extensive backstory.

It leverages the psychological ‘halo effect,’ where our impression of a person in one aspect (like heroism) influences our overall perception of them.

Recall the memorable introduction of the first Samurai, heroically saving a child from a kidnapper. If you don’t check the scene here at 19:46

A Scene from Seven Samurai
A Scene from Seven Samurai

Use of Close-ups to Convey Emotion and Tension

A close-up shot from Seven Samurai

Kurosawa’s frequent use of close-up shots is pivotal in capturing and conveying characters’ emotions. By focusing on their expressions, especially in moments of fear or awe, he magnifies the impact of the situation and the presence of the heroes. For instance, scenes where villagers express fear or reverence towards the samurai are made more poignant through tight shots. This technique effectively transmits the characters’ fear, awe, or respect to the audience.

Symbolic Imagery and Metaphors

Kurosawa also masterfully employed symbolism to deepen his storytelling. He used elements of nature, like rain or wind, to mirror the mood or internal state of the characters. This adds a rich layer to their portrayal.

A Rain Shot from Seven Samurai
A Rain Shot from Seven Samurai

Consider the scenes with gusty winds, which set a tone of unrest and turmoil. The natural landscape is another vital element. In Seven Samurai, the rugged, rural setting underscores the themes of the film: the harshness of life for the villagers and the simplicity and purity of their existence. This starkly contrasts with the life of the samurai, caught between their code of honour and the reality of a changing world.

Oh! Wait! Why am I writing all this while I intend to talk about SALAAR?

Because SALAAR tried all the elements that I have shared in a mediocre way without much conviction.

SALAAR falls short as an extraordinary Ethical Combat Drama, even though it had the potential to be one. As I said, it’s not extraordinary, but it’s still a decent film in this genre, albeit lacking a convincing central character.

The World of Khansaar in ‘SALAAR’

A Poster from Salaar
A Poster from Salaar

Director Prashanth Neel’s strength is world-building. With Khansaar, he transports you to a new world and keeps you engaged with multiple storylines. However, for those who have seen Ugram, there may not be any surprises. They might not enjoy this ‘old Khansaar in a new bottle,’ apart from some grandiose action sequences and a lacklustre actor.

Prabhas With A Hangover & Neel With A Template

Prashanth Neel’s protagonists typically embody a machismo figure who abides by his mother’s words. However, in this film, the mother sentiment is overshadowed by the theme of friendship. I commend Neel for not overusing Prabhas in terms of dialogue or action.

Prithviraj & Prabhas from Salaar
Prithviraj & Prabhas from Salaar

Personally, I feel Prabhas hasn’t given his 100% in his recent movies, seemingly relying on his stardom and compromising his skills and effort. To be blunt, his performance appears as if he is acting with a hangover.

Prithviraj’s Mastery vs Neel’s Directorial Gambit

I want to recognise Neel again as a potential director because his efforts to make Salaar a comeback film for Prabhas are evident, even though Prabhas remains the same. Neel manages to extract the best from Prabhas with his slow-motion walking shots, dialogue delivery, and action sequences.

Prashant Neel
Prashant Neel

In every single frame, Prithviraj, as Varadha, excels, highlighting the contrast with Prabhas’ lacklustre performance. The difference is stark and makes it easy to understand why Neel shouldn’t have cast such a strong performer opposite Prabhas.

Prithviraj’s Game of Thrones Analogy and the Reality of SALAAR

It was Prithviraj’s words that initially drew me to watch SALAAR. Known for films like Lucifer, Ayaalum Njanum Thammil, and Ayyappanum Koshiyum, Prithviraj compared SALAAR to the American epic fantasy series Game of Thrones.

Trailer from Lucifer

However, let me clarify: SALAAR mainly revolves around Deva and Varadha, with other characters playing minor or just fancy roles in the screenplay. This fact alone challenges Prithviraj’s comparison.

When it comes to Ethical and Moral Dilemmas, Combat and Strategy, Cultural and Historical Elements, and especially intricate character dynamics – all hallmarks of Game of Thrones – SALAAR doesn’t quite measure up, except in visual grandeur.

In my opinion, PS-1 & PS-2 would be far more appropriate comparisons to Game of Thrones.

Last But Not Least

In summary, SALAAR presents a mediocre attempt at Ethical Combat Dramas because of its shallow characters and massy star obsessions. But I admit that it treads a fine line between potential greatness and missed opportunities.

While it may not fully live up to the towering expectations set by comparisons to epics like Game of Thrones, it still carves out its niche in a genre rich with few moral complexities and thrilling action.

For those who want to try Ethical Combat Dramas and are looking to explore further, I recommend trying classics like ‘Seven Samurai’ and ‘Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon’ which are masterclasses in this genre.

Merry Christmas: A Tale of Yadhoom, Love, and Mystery

Merry Christmas, directed by Sriram Raghavan, is a beautiful film, especially if you like slow-paced yet engaging movies like the Before trilogy. Merry Christmas uniquely blends the romantic drama of Wong Kar Wai with the suspenseful elements of Hitchcockian noir thrillers.

Merry Christmas Title Credit

In essence, it’s reminiscent of Thiyagarajan Kumararaja’s Ninaivo Oru Paravai, which seamlessly fuses these two elements. It’s not surprising that the director, Sriram Raghavan, mentioned Thiyagarajan Kumararaja as an inspiration.

Retro Charm & A Mood For Love, Sprinkled with Witty Black Humour

Merry Christmas begins with a note saying, ‘When Mumbai was known as Bombay.The film takes place in Bombay during the 1970s and makes you feel nostalgic.

The colours, music, and songs in the film are sync with the era and make the experience even better. The story revolves around Albert (Vijay Sethupathi) and Maria (Katrina Kaif). Two souls wandering in the neon-lit lanes of Bombay, whose lives intersect in a serendipitous Christmas encounter.

Merry Christmas Title Card

It’s more of like a O.Henry short story; whatever you are reading and imagining in the first half will get a 180 degree shift in the later half. 

The movie’s pacing is deliberate, slowly building up to a climax. If you are expecting a thriller like Andhadhun, you may get disappointed. Merry Christmas is a cute black comedy.

Perfect Blend of On Screen & Off Screen Efforts

Vijay Sethupathi is outstanding in his role. Watching him dance with Katrina Kaif, who is famous for dance numbers like Chikni Chameli,’ is a treat for the fans of both. You can’t help but be drawn in by Vijay’s cute dance performance.

The film’s homage to the bygone era of Bollywood, Vivaldi’s ‘Four Seasons’, background score by Daniel B George, all these adds layers to its storytelling, makes ‘Merry Christmas’ more than just a movie set in the 70s. It feels like it truly belongs to that time.

Scenes from Merry Christmas

Cinematographer Madhu Neelakandan deserves a special applause for meticulously capturing the essence of the setting, focusing on even the smallest details. The vibrant red-blue-green colour palette that fills each frame is so catchy and sync with the moments. However, the close-up shots of Katrina Kaif are a bit of a letdown. Personally, I felt that these moments were jarring, as Katrina seemed to struggle with conveying the subtlety of emotions required for these shots.

Sriram Raghavan’s Yadhoom: A Merry Christmas with Self-Discovery

Sriram Raghavan’s Merry Christmas not only shines with performances but also with its intriguing scripting.The movie looks at ‘Yadhoom’ moments – those instances of clarity and realisation of one’s true purpose in life.

Tamil veteran actor Rajesh plays a kind man who took care of Albert’s mother, Celine, before she passed away. He also looks after her apartment. He gives Albert a bottle of homemade wine called Yadhoom.

But what does Yadhoom mean?

Rajesh explains it like this:

‘We spend our lives working, raising families, and doing other things. But we’re all waiting for a special moment. When that moment comes, it’s like you suddenly know what you’re supposed to do. That’s what Yadhoom is about.

Merry Christmas (2024)

Sriram Raghavan carefully places his characters right before the Yadhoom moments in their lives. He shows us how they find out who they are and what they want.

Before he starts his night adventure Albert reads a quote “Night is Darkest Before The Dawn”, this blend with the eastern version of Yadhoom philosophy where challenges and sufferings lead to self-realisation. Hope you have watched Lion King which beautifully portrayed this philosophy.

Albert’s return to Bombay is more than just a trip. It’s a journey through his past and into his own heart. The idea of Yadhoom is key in the movie.

The characters of Albert and Maria are skillfully crafted to evolve towards this Yadhoom realisation. Their interactions, laden with yearning and a sense of lost time, gradually lead them to their respective Yadhoom moments.

Complementary Yadhoom Arcs

The characters, Albert and Maria, are created in a way that Maria is skeptical, fragile and is more sure of her motivations than her decisions, while Albert is almost too careful, yet easy going.

Katrina Kaif & Vijay from Merry Christmas

There is a dialogue from Albert: “I’ve left a lot of things unfinished in life, but never a bottle of chilled beer,”. These complementary arcs in their behaviour is what makes them complete in the end while talking about the agony of remorse and awaiting. 

Sriram Raghavan’s storytelling is subtle, he cleverly uses the festive atmosphere of Christmas to create a striking contrast with the deep self-reflection experienced by his characters. This contrast serves to highlight their personal growth. Initially burdened by their pasts and uncertainties, Albert and Maria evolve throughout the film. They move from being individuals weighed down by life’s complexities to people who gradually come to embrace the concept of Yadhoom.

Yadhoom, Albert and Maria: Philosophical Layers in Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas is more than just a black comedy on screen. It introduces us to the deep ideas of some philosophies.

Katrina Kaif & Vijay Sethupathi playing Flying Wish Paper Swan

Existentialism

For example, the film reflects existentialism. This is the belief that people must create their own meaning in a world that doesn’t have a clear purpose. Albert and Maria are characters struggling to escape their past and the truth, and in the end, they use what happens in their lives to make their own meaning and purpose for their present.

Stoicism

The film also shows ideas from Stoicism. Stoicism consists of wisdom, justice, courage, and moderation.

This ancient philosophy teaches that people should accept what happens in their lives and use these experiences to grow and become better people. We see this in how Albert and Maria deal with their past and how they change to find their purpose. In the climax there is a shot where Maria burns a Teddy and keeps two fish in the flush tanks. The way that night ends was narrated beautifully by Sriram and captured elegantly. by Madhu Neelakantan.

Even there is an instance were, Albert talks about Violence, he says: “Violence is better than the sufferings from non-violence”. This reminds me of Dharma philosophy.

In summary, ‘Merry Christmas’ is not just a black comedy thriller but a philosophical journey that resonates with the heart and mind. Echoing the essence of trendy Ikigai, Existentialism, Dharma,and all other such philosophies, Merry Christmas inspires us to explore our own paths, encouraging us to find our unique place in the world.

Read more reviews and get updates here.

Why Only One Pandava Reached Heaven

The saga of the Pandava brothers and Draupadi, their final journey to heaven, unfolds the curtain of sin, love, compassion, and unwavering adherence to Dharma.Here we are looking at why the righteous Pandavas suffered.

The Pandavas anointed Parikshit as the crown prince of Hastinapura. They appointed Yuyutsu as the guardian of the young prince. Yuyutsu, born to Dhritarashtra and a Shudra woman, was a beloved figure among the Pandava brothers. He had shown courage to stand with them on the path of Dharma and was considered a son-like to them.

From Hastinapura, Pandava brothers and Draupadi set out walking in the northern direction. In one word, ‘Vanaprastham’

Pandava’s Maha Vanaprastham

Draupadi: The First Loss

On their journey, the first to surrender to mortality was Draupadi. Bhima saw this first, and he couldn’t bear that. His love for Draupadi was profound; he was the one who loved her most.

He fiercely avenged her dishonour in the Kaurava court with blood. During their exile in the forest, Bhima diligently ensures Draupadi’s safety and comfort. How could we forget the Kichaka chapter from Mahabharatha? Even when Arjuna was hesitant, Bhima prioritised Draupadi. Even Bhima encountered Hanuman to fulfil Draupadi’s desire for a flower.


Bhima washing Draupadi's hair with blood (Image credit: insta/saptasarka)
Bhim washing Draupadi’s hair with blood (Image credit: insta/saptasarka)

Bhima collapsed, seeing Draupadi lying motionless on the earth. But the Pandava brothers knew they had to keep going. When others were walking, Bhima asked Yudhishthira, the wisest among all, ‘Why did Draupadi die? She did nothing wrong.’

Yudhishthira said, ‘Our journey is about more than just living and dying. We shouldn’t think too much about it. Draupadi was good, but she was only meant to come with us until here.’ Bhima said, ‘But she was our wife! She should always be with us!’ Yudhishthira calmly said, ‘It’s not up to us. What happened to Draupadi was because of what she did in her life.

Draupadi: Where Love meets Sin

Draupadi loved all five of us, but deep in her heart, she had a special place for Arjuna, the first one to win her heart. This natural inclination of her heart highlights the nuanced psychology of love and attachment in women. A woman, even if she is with many men, can deeply love only one. Maybe he was her first love, or maybe he was the one who made her wet for the first time or who offered her a shoulder in her darkest hours.

Yudishitra, Wisest among the Pandava Brothers
Draupadi with Pandava brothers (Image credit: Hotstar)
Draupadi with Pandava brothers (Image credit: Hotstar)

Bhima, Draupad’s sin was her lust towards Arjuna, but remember, she was noble and righteous, and that’s why she could travel with us this far. I understand your deep feelings for her. You have always protected her. Only Arjuna could truly win her heart, beyond her physical being. And for the four of us who came after, she never denied us fairness and love. She never showed dislike or boredom for our sake. Draupadi was like a goddess! let’s move on, Bhima.’ 

The Downfall of Sahadeva, Nakula, and Arjuna

During their ongoing journey, Sahadeva was the next to die, followed by Nakula. Yudhishthira explained to Bhima that Sahadeva’s pride in his wisdom and Nakula’s pride in his beauty were their downfalls.

Then, it was Arjuna’s turn. He also surrendered to Yama, the god of death. Bhima again asked Yudhishthira why. Yudhishthira said, ‘Arjuna once vowed to defeat all enemies by himself. This boastfulness and wrath, along with his envy, were his sins. That’s why he couldn’t continue the journey.‘ Then they continued walking

Losses Along the Way: Fall of a Gentle Giant

When Bhima was about to fall, he asked Yudhishthira, ‘Elder brother, I am about to fall. What’s my fault?’ Yudhishthira replied, ‘Bhima, you are dear to me. But your pride in your strength and your love for food (gluttony) were your downfalls.‘ Yudhishthira continued his journey alone, as his brothers’ deaths did not stop him.

Bhima Fighting against Asur
Bhima Fighting against Asur

At Heaven’s Gate: Righteous Among Pandavas

From the day they left Hastinapura, a dog had been following the Pandavas. Even as others fell during the long journey, the dog stayed with Yudhishthira. When Yudhishthira reached his destination, the gates of heaven were ready to welcome him. Indra arrived in his chariot and said to Yudhishthira, ‘Climb into the chariot! There is no one in heaven more worthy than you to join us. Don’t hesitate, Yudhishthira, come with me!

Yudishtira and Indra
Yudishtira and Indra

Yudhishthira told Indra, ‘I’m not completely happy with this blessing you’ve given me.’ ‘What? You don’t want to go to heaven?’ asked Indra. Yudhishthira replied, ‘No, Lord! The Pandavas and Draupadi started this journey together. They all died on the way, and I don’t even know what happened to them. Going to heaven alone will bring me more pain than joy. My brothers are my life, and Draupadi is part of our soul. Please tell me where they are now.’Indra smiled and said, ‘Yudhishthira, the world has never seen a brother as loving as you. You often seemed weak because of your love for your family. Is this really commendable? Is it that hard to let go?‘ Yudhishthira, with a lifeless smile, replied, A person without love for his dependents doesn’t deserve to live on earth. My love for my brothers and Draupadi is beyond my senses. Please help me!

Indra told Yudhishthira, ‘Your brothers and Draupadi were good people. They have already reached heaven after leaving their bodies behind. But they did not have the greatness you have, so you are allowed to enter heaven while still alive. Climb into the chariot. You can trust my words.’ Yudhishthira responded, ‘I have one more request.’ Indra looked at Yudhishthira sceptically.

Yudhishthira’s Conflict of Heart and Duty

Yudhishthira said, ‘I cannot abandon this dog that has been with me until the end of my journey. Please let it come with me on the chariot.’ Indra laughed a little and said, ‘You know that dogs cannot enter heaven. Yet, you insist on this worthless animal.’

‘No! Lord Indra, go ahead without me. This dog will always be with me. If I leave this dog behind, all my good deeds for heaven will be worthless. I will never abandon those who depend on me!

Indra said, ‘You left your brothers and Draupadi on the way. Do you care more for this insignificant dog?’ Yudhishthira replied, ‘My brothers and Draupadi died along the way, and I couldn’t bring them back to life. But this poor animal is still alive and has been with me through this long journey. I cannot abandon it.’ As Indra looked at Yudhishthira with compassion, the dog transformed. It was Dharma Deva, the god of death, who had followed him in the form of a dog. He said, ‘Son, your compassion has filled me with pride. You have passed a test beyond ordinary trials. The world will praise you as Yudhishthira, a name synonymous with dharma. Your words and actions have always been rooted in righteousness, and you have never strayed from this path. Go with Indra.’

Yudhishthira boarded Indra’s chariot, and they soared through the sky, eventually reaching heaven.

The Celestial Reunion of Pandavas

He entered heaven and saw Krishna sitting on a majestic throne, with Arjuna beside him. They stood up and joyfully welcomed Yudhishthira. He found Karna among the twelve Adityas and bowed to him. Karna smiled and welcomed his brother. Bhima was among the Maruts, Nakula and Sahadeva were near the Ashwini Kumaras, and they all greeted Yudhishthira with respect. Draupadi, shining like a bright star, was there with their five sons. They all bowed to Yudhishthira. He saw Drona blessed by Brihaspati and Bhishma seated among the Vasus, to whom he bowed. Duryodhana, smiling on a special throne, stood up to honour Yudhishthira. In heaven, there is no enmity. Duryodhana, having died a heroic death and fulfilled his duties well, had earned a special place in heaven. (Even Yudishtira did a minor sin and he faced some challenges at Heaven, but we skipped that part since it’s too long for this)

Bhavachakra describing the cycle of saṃsāra
Bhavachakra describing the cycle of saṃsāra

Beyond Myths: Love, Loss, and Life’s Eternal Lessons

The reunion with his brothers, Draupadi and Duryodhana, each radiant in their own right, symbolised the eternal cycle of life, death, and redemption. So, this story might be more than just a myth because it reveals a timeless truth: Draupadi’s quiet love for Arjuna, even as Bhima loves her deeply, shows us how complex our hearts can be. It tells us that even wise and strong people like Yudhishthira struggle with letting go of those they love. Finally, it tells us that, in the heart of forgiveness and empathy, lies the true path to liberation, the Moksha.

For more stories and articles. click here.