What I like most about Trivikram Srinivas is how he connects mythological stories with mass masala movies. He often places his heroes in the roles of Vishnu, Rama, or Krishna, making them feel like incarnations of these divine figures. In Saripodhaa Sanivaaram, Vivek Athreya followed a similar approach.
Saripodhaa Sanivaaram Title card
Have you heard the story of Narakasura?
Narakasura was a powerful and evil demon king, the son of Bhudevi (Mother Earth) and Varaha, an avatar of Lord Vishnu. Despite his divine origins, Narakasura was notorious for his wickedness and cruelty. He ruled the kingdom of Pragjyotisha, where he terrorized people and killed many innocents.
His power and arrogance grew so immense that even the heavens were disturbed by his actions.
Finally, Lord Krishna decided to fight Narakasura. However, Narakasura had a boon that only his mother could kill him. Krishna, knowing this, allowed Satyabhama, who was an incarnation of Bhudevi, to take the lead in the battle.
Plot: Saripodhaa Sanivaaram
Saripodhaa Sanivaaram begins with this story, and throughout the movie, Naani keeps referring to it. In a way, S. J. Suriyah represents a modern-day Narakasura, Sokulapalam is a modern-day Pragjyotisha, and Surya and his girlfriend Charulatha can be seen as Krishna and Satyabhama.
Nani vs S J Suriyah Face Off from Sanivaaram
But there is one difference, Krishna empowers others to take action against injustice but Suriya is different, when he witnesses injustice, he does not let it go.
Why You Should Try This Movie
This movie is packed with all the elements that make for commercial success in Tollywood and Kollywood: mother sentiment, father sentiment, sister sentiment, and a hero saving a community from oppression or vigilantism. A hero introduction setup where he fights against injustice. You’ll experience intense cat-and-mouse games between the villain and the hero.
Nani & Priyanka Mohan
But what’s most impressive is that Vivek Athreya proves you don’t need to rely on showing the actress’s navel, a mass item song, or a foreign set song to create a mass action flick. Even though it’s a mass entertainer, Vivek Athreya keeps a minimalist approach, ensuring that you won’t get bored with cliches. In one line, Saripodhaa Sanivaaram is a middle-class Chathrapathi or a Vikramarkudu on a low budget.
A Domino Game and Athreya’s 6 Chapters
I feel like Vivek Athreya, as a writer, took inspiration from films like Tamil Maaveran and various Hollywood movies. He segmented Saripodhaa Sanivaaram into six chapters: the prologue, the turn, the knot, the crossroads, hide and seek, and redemption. It’s almost as if Vivek Athreya is trolling mass-action fans, sarcastically asking us, ee formula Saripodhaa? (Isn’t that enough?).
S J Suriyah as C I Daya
He established Suriyah (Nani) with subplots, Charulatha (Priyanka Mohan) with an open-ended past, and Daya (S J Suriyah) laced with dark humour and a dysfunctional family plot, all of which set the stage for a fire show.
The way Vivek wrote the script is like a domino effect—each event triggers the next, and each character drives an event. It’s beautiful to witness the script evolve so rhythmically.
Performances & Cast
When it comes to performances, Abhirami’s portrayal of the mother was deeply touching and reminded me of Simran in Kannathil Muthamittal, especially those moments at the beach, and some elements from Bhanupriya of Chathrapathi.
Sai Kumar, the millennium’s angry young man, plays a father struggling to pacify his angry young son. There wasn’t much for a veteran like Sai Kumar to do, aside from a few bass voice narrations.
Nani as Suriyah
S. J. Suriyah and Nani played their characters brilliantly, convincingly portraying their utterly chaotic and distressed lives. Both are going through pain triggered by siblings—one suffering because of his brother, the other troubled by his sister.
Murli Sharma and Ajay Ghosh’s characters were icing on the cake with the perfect touch of humour to the film with their mannerisms and timing.
S J SUriyah speech at Saripodhaa Sanivaaram pre-release event
However, Priyanka Mohan’s character didn’t quite convince me. As S. J. Suriyah mentioned during the pre-release event of Saripodhaa Sanivaaram, Priyanka was too cute even as a constable. Her makeup, costume, and body language felt more like a hero’s pillion rider. I wish she had played a more prominent role, similar to what we see in the Narakasura story.
Jakes Bejoy: The Master of Elevation
Last but not least, Jakes Bejoy is the one who ensures you won’t dig too much on logic. Instead, you’re completely sucked into Athreya’s world, where no poor man uses social media or mobile cameras. For every question that pops into your head, Vivek’s writing will push you to another event, and Jakes Bejoy’s BGM will scream loud, and shut your curious mind, keeping you on track.
Saripodhu Ee Sanivaram
Finally, it’s technically a Vivek Athreya vigilante story, but I believe it’s actually a Vivek Athreya revenge story—a revenge against the Telugu audience who made his Ante Sundaraniki a flop. Now, he’s screaming loud to you: Saripodhaa Ee Sanivaram! (Is this Saturday enough??) I believe people are saying a big yes! Ee saari assalu bore kottaledhu.
Refer to this image for a better reading experience.
If you ask me, which is the brilliant Malayalam film from the 2024 first quarter, I would say it’s Aattam. Aattam is a 2024 Malayalam suspense chamber drama. Penned by debutant director Anand Ekarshi, Aattam navigates through the politics of gender dynamics, patriarchy, situational morality & selfishness in humans, within a theatrical setting. If you have seen this movie, most viewers ask a question: Who is the culprit in Aattam. Let me explain the layers of Aattam first, and if you are impatient, just scroll down.
Plot Overview
Aattam is a thriller of accusation and betrayal set against the backdrop of a theatre troupe. The plot circles around Anjali, the group’s only female actor, levelling charges of sexual harassment against a newly joined popular movie star in their team.
A scene from Aattam
What starts as a straightforward allegation soon spirals into a complex web of deceit, manipulation, and shifting loyalties, especially when the proposal of a European tour throws the troupe into moral disarray.
The narrative cleverly employs a classic whodunit structure, yet the way it unveils the innate biases and hypocrisy of its characters is what makes it interesting.
How Aanand, wrote each character is truly admirable; for example, the character Aji (the eldest among them): Aanand constructed the character through micro interactions (mentioning phone calls, his mannerisms, etc).
Transformation scenes of Aji from Aattam
At the same time, Aji’s transformation didn’t go well (someone who doesn’t care about dying suddenly willing to compromise on himself so that he can go to Europe is a bit forced, in my opinion). And all this was just so that he could say what he said at the end.
Finding The Culprit & Theme of Aattam #Whodunnit
Aattam is not about Whodunnit; by the end of the film, if you are just curious to know Whodunnit, then I would say this film is not for you. This film is not about the sinner; rather, it’s about the sin.
It’s like wondering if Teddy Daniels in Shutter Island chooses to live in a lie or faces the truth in the end. The real question isn’t what reality he picks. It’s about Teddy reaching a point where he prefers peace over constant torment, regardless of whether his world is real or made up. So, he makes a choice that might lead him to a lobotomy, showing he’d rather forget than live with the pain.
A scene from Shutter Island
The movie is sprinkled with so many minor flaws in human interactions, be they judgmental, generalisation based on experience, selfishness, hypocrisy, vigilantism, patriarchal mindset, social influence, arrogance, or demeaning others.
A scene from Aattam
Even in the way he shows patriarchal ideologies in all layers of society, for example, there is a scene where a politician requests Madan’s vote, saying, Come and vote for me with the same finger that you have voted for my father.
By the end, when Anjali says: “നീ ആരാണെന്ന് എനിക്കറിയണ്ട. നീയും ആ 11 പേരും തമ്മിൽ ഇന്നെനിക്ക് ഒരു വ്യത്യാസവുമില്ല”
Climax scene from Aattam
The director Anand Ekarshi summarises the movie there. But if you are curious to find the culprit from Aattam, I will help you. Scroll down straght to the last sub-heading.
12 Angry Men v/s Aattam
Aattam is very similar to the classic 12 Angry Men, be it the style, theme, and narration. It’s evident that Aanand Ekarshi is highly inspired by 12 Angry Men.
The film 12 Angry Men exemplifies many social psychology theories. This tense, compelling film, features a group of jurors who must decide the guilt or innocence of the accused.
12 Angry Men
Initially, eleven of the twelve jurors vote guilty. Gradually, through heated discussion, the jurors are swayed to a not-guilty decision. Upon examination, the film highlights social psychology theories in areas of conformity, attitude change, and group processes.
Don’t you think it’s the same structure that Anand is following here?
When the inverter stops working, everyone leaves the house and steps outside due to the heat. Later, when it starts to rain, everyone rushes inside the house. These 2 scenes are one of the few scenes in which background music can be heard.
I think the director Anand Ekarshi wants to emphasise these 2 scenes, to show how we change our stance depending on the situation. The whole team was sure about throwing out Shajon’s character initially, but when the London Trip was introduced, everyone changed their stance.
A scene from 12 Angry Men
A similar scene you can see from 12 Angry Men, where they open the windows because it’s too hot inside, and they open up the windows.
This shows that we humans change our stands as per our needs. This is where, I thought it would have been great if there were a couple of women who initially stood with Anjali and then turned their backs after the European trip offer came, It would better show that most people are hypocrites, not just men.
Attitude Change and Persuasion in the First Half
The central route to persuasion is all about logic and reason. It’s where you convince someone by using strong arguments, evidence, and facts to back up your position.
In the first half, you can see that Madan, Sijin, Jolly and Santosh are doing this.
For example, Sijin asks Madan: “What exactly did she tell you”, or Jolly asks: “So it happened not when she was awake”
Peripheral v/s Central persuasion
The peripheral route of persuasion is the opposite of the central route. It’s a shortcut to influencing someone, relying on indirect cues and associations rather than strong arguments.
It targets our emotions and biases, and doesn’t require much effort from the audience to process. Vinay, Aji, Nandan, Sudheer, and Selvan are following this route.
For example when Nandan says: “He will do it, he always shares bawdy jokes”. or Selvan says: ” A sober mind wouldn’t do such things, it happened becuase they were drunk”. Through the use of non-factual, environmental cues, the sick gentleman utilises the peripheral route to persuasion.
Another important factor is Social loafing. It describes a situation where people exert less effort when working in a group compared to working alone. It’s like slacking off a bit because you think others will pick up the slack.
Prashanth and Jolly are in that stage, where they are slacking off with excuses.
Imagine you and your friends are discussing a movie. Some might initially like it a little, some might be neutral, and a few might dislike it. Through discussion, those who liked it a little might become more enthusiastic, and those who disliked it might become even more critical. This is group polarisation.
Vinay brilliantly polarised everyone in one direction, by the end of the first half.
Moral Disengagement in The Second Half
Throughout Aattam, you are going to witness a few complexities in human behaviours like Moral Disengagement and Hypocrisy.
What is moral disengagement?
Moral disengagement is basically a fancy way of saying someone talks themselves into believing ethical rules don’t apply to them in a specific situation. It’s a psychological process that lets people act unethically without feeling bad about it.
Moral Disengagement
Moral justification: Coming up with reasons why their actions are good, even if they aren’t. In Aattam, how conveniently the characters brought different reasons after they got to know about the European trip.
Observe how Selvan, Madan, Aji and Jolly. For instance, Jolly, the silent guy in the first half is aggressive and says “Just swallow the story in the whole”.
Euphemistic labelling: Using nicer words to downplay the seriousness of their actions. For example when Madan talks about “Tactile Halluccination” he is trying to nullify her arguments in a sweeter way compared to Santhosh and Sijin.
Discrediting the victim: This involves downplaying the harm caused to the victim or portraying them as deserving of the negative consequences.
For example, Selvan saying about Anjali’s drinking habit, Prashant talking about her relationship with a married man, Sijin talking about her relationship, even addressing her as “Set-up”.
Disregarding or minimising consequences: This involves downplaying the negative outcomes of the action. For example, Vinay saying Anjali ” No one did anything to you, let’s believe it like that.”
I really love that scene where Anjali asked the question to vinay: “If it’s not Hari, who was it? , no one raised this question”. this is where the brilliance of the script, in the beginning, everyone was talking about the punishments, but when they realised it’s not Hari and one among them, they conviniently went through the moral disengagement and forgot the whodunnit part.
Who Is The Actual Culprit: Aattam Ending Explained
If you really want a culprit, let me share some thoughts:
In the final scene of the movie, in Anjali’s drama, the culprit confesses while Anjali is holding a yellow cloth. There is only one character in the whole movie who is wearing a yellow dress. Is that the culprit?
That’s not a rational finding, right?
Okay, one more theory:
Anjali said, there was an intense perfume smell. Guys who fell in the pool won’t have that intense smell.
Jolly, Sudheer, Prashanth and Vinay were the people who didn’t fall in the pool.
Let’s eliminate Vinay, since, he is her lover. Jolly was busy with his video call and was disturbed, so let’s eliminate him.
Now either it should be Prashanth or Sudheer. Sudheer and Prashanth are the ones who got disturbed while hearing this, and went out for smoking.
I believe it’s Sudheer. WHY?
During that party, Sudheer was disturbed by seeing Anjali’s cleavage, that disturbance can be an arousal as well. Sudheer tried to hide the evidence in the first half, without any rationality. Near to the climax, while Jolly is showing the screenshot to others, Sudheer acts like he is seeing the first time. He was in a hurry to establish Hari as the culprit. He consistently avoided involving the police.
Sudheer’s key scenes from Aattam
Being a smoker, Sudheer knew that Hari kept cigarettes in his car. He likely stole the car keys before the other person retrieved them.
Additionally, Sudheer watched pornography just before the incident. that was revealed later. Madan is asking why Nandhan went to Shajitha’s room, if we place Sudheer in Nandhan’s place, we have an answer: Sudheer might have gone there to see his wife and might have seen Anjali.
So, I believe it’s Sudheer. But let me remind you that the essence of film is not #Whodunnit
“നീ ആരാണെന്ന് എനിക്കറിയണ്ട. നീയും ആ 11 പേരും തമ്മിൽ ഇന്നെനിക്ക് ഒരു വ്യത്യാസവുമില്ല” 👌 { “I don’t need to know who you are. You and those 11 people are all the same to me today.” – Anjali }
Dark Impulse (2011), a gripping Spanish thriller, stars the captivating Veronica Echegui, Alex García & Juan Pablo Shuk. The original Spanish title is ‘Lo Mejor De Eva’.
Dark Impulse Movie Poster
The Plot: Judicial Ethics Meets Forbidden Passion
Eva (Leonor Watling) is a young, integrous, and relentless judge. Her judicial career, prompted by her father, a former prosecutor, has shaped her in his image. With him now in a coma, she finds herself dealing with the death of a young stripper, Liuba (Polina Kiryanova). This sets the stage for Lo mejor de Eva aka Dark Impulse (2011), directed by Mariano Barroso. It’s his comeback after Hormigas en la boca(2005) and Kasbah (2000).
Leonor Watling as Eva
Dark Impulse starts as a typical courtroom drama, where we get to know the Eva. What initially appears as a straightforward legal proceeding, soon spirals into an unexpected romantic entanglement as Eva falls for Rocco (Miguel Angel Silvestre), the key witness and former boyfriend of the murdered girl. As Eva and Rocco’s relationship tightens, the film morphs into a high-voltage erotic thriller. The scenes showcasing the chemistry between the protagonists are the film’s best parts.
From Courtroom to Bedroom: Eva’s Struggle with Desire
Eva’s life, which has always been deeply entrenched in her legal work, begins to unravel as she succumbs to her intense attraction to Rocco. The judge, initially cold and distant, transforms into a passionate woman driven by impulses she never knew she possessed.
Leonor Watling from Dark Impulse
These drastic changes not only affect her personal life but also have implications for the ongoing murder case. As the plot progresses, the line between right and wrong becomes increasingly blurred, pulling the viewer into a thrilling whirlpool of suspense and eroticism.
Echoes of Urbizu: A Tale of Two Judges
The film, in some ways, echoes Enrique Urbizu’s No Rest For the Wicked (2011), which also features a judge with many similarities to Eva. However, where Urbizu’s film focused on a cop, Barroso’s centers on Eva’s life. Everything changes when Rocco (Miguel Angel Silvestre), the boyfriend of the murdered girl, becomes the key witness.
From Verdict to Vulnerability: The Dark Impulse of Events
The film grips the viewer’s attention from the get-go. However, due to its unpredictability and sudden shifts in tone and genre, it may lead to some confusion. The transformation of Dark Impulse from a courtroom drama into an erotic thriller could take the viewer by surprise.
Leonor Watling from Dark Impulse
Despite these abrupt shifts, the film does an impressive job of maintaining the suspense and intrigue throughout, offering a thrilling experience for those who enjoy genre-bending narratives.
The Lighting of the film, particularly in the erotic scenes, is noteworthy. The camera work in these scenes is exceptional, creating an ambiance that accentuates the charged chemistry between Eva and Rocco.
A Final Thought: Dark Impulse
The way Dark Impulse combines elements of a courtroom drama with those of an erotic thriller, echoes the tonal shifts seen in films such as Basic Instinct. It also reflects narrative elements seen in Body Heat, where the lines between law and desire, right and wrong, are obscured, creating a morally grey space that is as intriguing as it is unsettling. The film’s unique blend of genres sets it apart, while also drawing parallels with other classics in the erotic thriller category.
Miguel Angel Silvestre as Rocco
So, if you are a fan of such movies, give it a try. Dark Impulse is an interesting pick for those looking for a film that is not just a thriller but also explores into human psychology and sensuality.
As an ardent fan of Pawan Kumar, my expectations were sky-high for Dhoomam, especially after being enamored with his last web series, Kudi Yedamayithe. I eagerly waited two long years for Pawan Kumar to unveil his new work, post Kudi Yedamayithe.
Dhoomam Title card
However, to my disappointment, I couldn’t find the signature sophistication and finesse I had anticipated from Pawan Kumar in Dhoomam. It doesn’t show the output of 2 years of homework.
Plot
The plot centers around Avinash (Fahadh Faasil), who is the marketing head of a major tobacco company. He and his wife Diya (Aparna Balamurali) find themselves held hostage in a secluded hilly terrain. The kidnapper issue a series of demands via phone calls, prompting Avinash and Diya to complete certain tasks to save their lives.
The film switches between the couple’s present predicament and flashbacks to Avinash’s career rise in the tobacco company run by Sid (Roshan Mathew). In the past, we see Avinash’s cunning methods to promote the company’s products and influence government policies.
The plot leaves some loose ends, with questions around who the ‘faceless’ caller is and why Avinash is being targeted instead of Sid, the actual head of the company.
Expectations and Initial Disappointment
Director Pawan Kumar’s effort to highlight a grave issue like smoking deserves applause. However, the film’s execution leaves much to be desired. The kidnapping scene at the beginning of the film is unconvincing and disrupts the viewing experience. The film’s pacing feels off, with crucial events happening too rapidly and without adequate build-up. These elements, combined with a plethora of continuity errors, contribute to a sense of disconnection from the narrative.
Direction and Continuity Issues
When the movie starts, we can see Aparna Balamurali is waiting for Fahad Fazil and it’s raining, but while getting into the car, you can see that she is not at all wet. I couldn’t find any raindrops on her face, hair, or dress. If this movie was directed by any other directors from Kannada, I wouldn’t have cared, but since it was Pawan Kumar, this was a friction point for me.
With poor editing and scripting, the kidnapping scene in the movie was so artificial and unconvincing for me. There were a lot of loopholes in that scene, and I found so many continuity issues in just 20 minutes of the film. For example, I don’t know why the kidnapper took the watch from Fahad Fassil. While driving, there is a watch on his left hand, but in the morning it is not there.
There is a fight scene between a gunman and Fahad Fassil, and you can see a lot of wounds and bruises over his face and body, but after a face wash, he is clean and left with only a scar.
Characterization and Plot Development
When it comes to the plot development, I would say it is highly predictable and filled with cliched events.
The character development also suffered from amateur first thoughts. Take Fahad Fazil’s character Avinash as an example; he was portrayed as a creative thinker, problem-solver, and ambitious individual. However, the writer failed to provide a compelling trigger for this character’s transformation or introspection. I found it unconvincing that such a calculating character would alter his mindset without a strong reason.
All this means I couldn’t enjoy the movie at all? A Big No!!
Why You Should Try This Movie
There are some dialogues from Fahad Fazil as a marketer that really strike every citizen, I believe. For example, the way Avinash (Fahad) marketed the vapes was so brilliant, and as a marketer, I find it so interesting, and I realized how dangerously our emotions and mirror neurons work.
Similarly, the government’s involvement in promoting tobacco usage was represented neatly.
Fahad Fazil as Avinash in Dhoomam
Fahadh Faasil, playing the ambitious marketer, delivers a solid performance, reflecting his character’s complexity and moral struggle. Aparna Balamurali, despite a somewhat overly dependent character, brings credibility to her role. Roshan Mathew also offers a convincing portrayal in his role as the head of the tobacco company.
The climax is well-drafted, so realistic, and well-executed. I strongly believe that climax can make a huge impact on anyone who smokes; at least they will think twice next time when they hold a cigarette. The last 15 minutes of the film were really worth it, and that’s where I found the signature of Pawan Kumar.
Despite its flaws, “Dhoomam” delivers a potent social message. The impactful final scenes carry a significant enough message to make smokers reconsider their habits, highlighting the dangers of tobacco usage.
Final Thoughts
It might be best described as a missed opportunity – a film that could have been a powerful social commentary but falls short due to its execution.
Kerala Crime Files, As Hotstar’s first Malayalam thriller web series, I held high hopes. And I was happy to see that Disney Hotstar managed to meet my expectations in terms of production quality.
The series, set in 2011, showed a clear investment in recreating that era’s technological and ambient milieu. The craftsmanship on display was remarkable.
Penned by Aashiq Imar and directed by Ahammed Khabeer (known for ‘Madhuram’ and ‘June’), I had a feeling that the narrative might have fared far better as a standalone OTT movie instead of a web series.
A Case of Too Long a Tale
The plot, at its core, is simple. Sub-Inspector Manoj and his team of four are on the heels of a sex worker’s murderer. Their leads? A fake address: Shiju Parayil Veedu, Neendakara, and a witness who claims the suspect has squinted eyes. They are solving the case within six days (6 Episodes).
It sounds gripping, doesn’t it?
However, as the story opened up, my interest began to wane. The narrative felt like a wafer-thin premise stretched far too thin; it’s pretty evident that the writer didn’t spend much time with the characters or the events. If it were a 100-minute movie, this writing might work well, but I am not sure about a crime-thriller web series.
The series takes off slowly, with the first two episodes feeling like they could have been compressed into one. The narrative regains momentum in the third episode, establishing a robust motive for the lead character (S.I. Manoj) to track down the killer. But after that, the excitement ebbs again, only to return in the fifth episode.
Although the choice to depict six days across six episodes lends realism, the thrill factor takes a hit, perhaps a side effect of my steady diet of thrillers.
Written Poor, but Executed Well
The characters, whether the killer or the police officers, lack depth and layers. The addition of officers’ personal lives seemed a ploy to stretch the runtime, lacking subtlety or layers. The writer tried to build an image of the murderer with the first five episodes, and when it was finally revealed, I found a mismatch between the buildup and reality. That’s where I felt the writer should have spent much more time with the scripting.
In the climax, the explanation of the motto felt artificial. The victim character did not pull it off well enough to make it convincing. However, I really enjoyed the villain and his subtle cues.
The series showcases commendable performances from Aju Varghese in the lead role, supported by Navaz Vallikunnu, Zhinz Shaan, and Devika Rajendran. Zhinz Shaan’s constable “Pradeep” deserves a special mention for his steadfast character arc. His obstinate and narrow-minded approach distinguishes him from his colleagues. Another noteworthy performance is that of Lal in the role of CI Kurian.
To sum it up, lower your expectations, and you may find ‘Kerala Crime Files’ enjoyable. While it manages to retain your attention, it falls short of being a nail-biting thriller. The expectations set by the trailer didn’t fully translate into the series, and it spoiled my experience with this thriller.
My Opinion: A Promising Start, but Does It Deliver? Doubtful
Have you ever wondered how scriptwriters create characters? Do they start from scratch? What lenses do scriptwriters use when they watch movies? Here, we will do a mini-script analysis to understand this better. To do this, we will look at the theme (events), characters, and the plot. I will focus on the characters and events more.
A Scene from Thief (1981)
For the purpose, we are choosing Thief, a 1981 American neo-noir heist action thriller film directed and written by Michael Mann. The film is loosely based on The Home Invaders by Frank Hohimer.
Thief (1981) A Brief Summary
In this 1981 film, Thief, Frank is a jewel thief of unparalleled skill. He manages to keep his past hidden behind the façade of a successful businessman. He has two thriving businesses and a seemingly peaceful life, but is it all as serene as it appears?
A scene from Thief (1981)
Frank thinks he has everything figured out. But there is one thing missing from his life: a family. When he starts dating Jessie, a cashier, the missing piece seems to be falling into place.
But then, everything changes. Frank is double-crossed during one last job, a diamond heist. His fencer, Joe Gags, is brutally killed, and his share of the loot is stolen. He is betrayed by Leo, a mob boss who has been watching his every move.
From a thrilling diamond heist gone wrong, to a dangerous game of cat-and-mouse with vengeance, and an unexpected twist in his personal life, Frank’s world spirals into chaos. His trusted friend is murdered, his family is threatened, and everything he’s worked for is on the brink of ruin.
But Frank is not going down without a fight. A man with nothing to lose is the most dangerous kind. Armed with determination, a burning desire for revenge, and a whole lot of explosives, Frank is ready to burn his past to the ground and settle the score. He’s done playing by the rules. It’s time for the master thief to step out of the shadows.
A Perfect Script & A Well Written Character
Let’s analyse the script and try to understand how the screenwriter Michael Mann might have developed it. What might have been his thought process when he started developing the script about Frank?
Character Sketch
Frank is a complex character. He is a skilled thief with a hardened exterior, but he also has a desire for a simple, “normal” life. This desire for normalcy comes from his need for stability, which is likely a reaction to his tumultuous past and ongoing criminal activities.
A scene from Thief (1981)
He shows signs of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to his past experiences in prison. He is hyper-vigilant, has recurring bouts of anger, and struggles with emotional intimacy. These experiences have also made him resilient and resourceful, but they have also made it difficult for him to trust others and let go of control.
Frank is an introverted individual who has adapted to survive in a world that demands extroversion. He is guarded, self-reliant, and meticulous in his work. He prefers solitude or the company of a select few. This could be a coping mechanism to manage his PTSD symptoms and control his environment.
Throughout the story, Frank goes on a journey of self-discovery and self-reconciliation. He is forced to confront his “shadow” (the hidden, darker aspects of his personality) and integrate it with his “persona” (the mask he presents to the world). This is a key part of his character arc.
Three Acts & Three Psychological Approaches
ACT ONE: Dissonance and Identity Crisis
In the first act, Frank aspires to live a normal life, indicating a clear cognitive dissonance between his personal identity and his occupational identity as a thief. This internal conflict plays a crucial role in driving the narrative and establishing the emotional tension in the film. This dissonance is a key driving force for the narrative and sets up the emotional tension.
Tuesday Weld as Jessie & James Caan as Frank from Thief (1981)
ACT TWO: Confrontation and Growth
In the second act of Thief, Frank’s inner conflict becomes too much to bear. After Leo betrays him, Frank’s dreams of a normal life are shattered. He is forced to face the reality of his criminal lifestyle.
A scene from Thief (1981)
Frank realises that he can’t have both. He can’t be a thief and have a normal life. This realisation is a turning point for Frank. It leads him to change his behaviour and attitude.
This confrontation can be related to thepsychoanalytic concept of ‘insight’. Frank’s confrontation with reality is a powerful moment of self-awareness. It propels him into the third act of the story.
Act Three: Resolution and Reconciliation
In the third act, Frank undergoes a transformation. He wants to escape his criminal past, so he embraces his “shadow” – the part of his personality that he had previously tried to suppress or deny. In Jungian psychology, confronting and accepting one’s shadow is a crucial step in achieving self-integration. Frank’s decision to quit his life of crime marks his journey towards reconciling his conflicting identities.
Frank’s narrative, from conflict through confrontation to resolution, mirrors a psychological journey that many individuals undertake when they confront uncomfortable truths about themselves.
Title Card
In Thief, this journey is not only an exploration of Frank’s character but also a wider commentary on identity, morality, and the potential for personal change.
Why A Must Watch?
Thief is one of the best “One Last Job” or “Double Life Rom-Com” movies I have ever seen. The scriptwriter did an excellent job of developing the characters, and I highly recommend this movie to anyone who loves to write.
Have you ever witnessed a crime that changed your life forever? Imagine finding yourself trapped in a deadly game of cat and mouse, pursued by ruthless criminals. What would you do to survive? The South African action thriller Hunting Emma directed by Byron Davis is about such an incident.
Leandie du Randt as Emma
A Teacher, A Drug Lord , A Crime & A Past
Emma le Roux, a pacifist kindergarten teacher, starts a trip to visit her father in the Karoo region. However, her journey takes a dark turn when she becomes an inadvertent witness to a horrifying crime. Suddenly, Emma finds herself in grave danger, caught between the criminals and her own will to survive.
A drug syndicate, led by the menacing Bosman (Neels van Jaarsveld), is attempting to transport a cache of drugs along the road. The group, consisting of his henchmen Baz and Jay, as well as AJ and Boela, two rich boys seeking notoriety, and Bosman’s nervous cousin Piet, crosses paths with Emma.
As the criminals close in on her, Emma’s peaceful nature gives way to a fierce determination. She taps into the skills her ex-Special Forces Commando father instilled in her during years of training. Emma transforms from a pacifist into a force to be reckoned with, willing to do whatever it takes to survive.
Get ready for a deadly game of cat and mouse.
Leandie du Randt: Woman On Fire
Despite a small budget and lesser-known actors, Hunting Emma strikes gold with its performances. Leandie du Randt, in the lead role of Emma, delivers an intensely believable performance.
There is nothing new about the plot: A History of Violence, No Country for Old Men, Nobody, Man on Fire, Taken, Equaliser, Maria (2019), and Man from Nowhere—all these films use the same template. Even the recent Indian films Vikram and Kaithi follow the same structure.
They feature a compelling character with a unique set of skills who is often brought out of retirement or their peaceful existence to confront some form of injustice.
They follow a familiar formula: a protagonist with a past, a catalyst for action (often an injustice suffered by the protagonist or their loved ones), and a subsequent series of escalating confrontations culminating in a cathartic resolution.
The repetitive use of this formula doesn’t lessen its appeal. That’s the beauty of this template. Why?
Psychology Behind This Template
Here, the heroes are not one-dimensional; they carry emotional baggage, past regrets, and personal demons, just like real people do. Watching them confront and overcome their past as they struggle against the external threat can be very satisfying for audiences.
Catharsis: In modern psychology, this has been associated with the idea of emotional release and the benefit of expressing emotions. The intense situations and violent encounters in these films can provide a form of vicarious catharsis for audiences, offering a sense of relief or even exhilaration.
From the perspective of a scriptwriter, these patterns serve both practical and artistic purposes. On the practical side, they provide a structure that guides the progression of the narrative, helps maintain tension and pace, and keeps audiences engaged.
On the artistic side, these patterns allow writers to explore different facets of a character’s personality, their moral and ethical boundaries, and how they evolve over the course of the narrative.
Script writer Deon Meyer did an excellent job considering this aspect.
Why Hunting Emma is a Must Watch!
So, Hunting Emma got a tick for all the above reasons, and I highly recommend it for you.
Hunting Emma is a unique blend of intense action, suspense, and character development.
The film takes us on a thrilling ride through the South African wilderness, showcasing both the beauty of the landscape and the depths of human determination. Great work from cinematographer William Collinson.
If you’re tired of the same old Hollywood blockbusters and you’re open to trying something new, then this South African Thriller might be the breath of fresh air you need.
So, are you ready to try a thriller from the other side of the world? Are you going to give Hunting Emma a watch? Let me know in the comments!
What’s the big advantage of making a thriller film like Por Thozhilas a debutant, especially a homicide thriller? You might think it’s the heart-pounding suspense or the dark and mysterious aesthetics.
Title Card: Por Thozhil
But from a scriptwriter’s perspective, the real charm lies in its easiness. If you have a solid “whodunit” hook and a twist in the end, you need only to ensure a smooth investigation filled with a few impressive moments. For debutant directors, it’s a surefire strategy. and there you have it. A recipe for minimum an above average status.
And that’s where Por Thozhil fits in. It’s a murder mystery that plays safe, sticking to the tried-and-tested formula.
It’s thrilling, engaging and, above all, familiar. But is that necessarily a bad thing? Not at all!
Familiar Grounds, Engaging Watch
Pick any classic homicide thriller and you’ll start seeing a pattern.
The detective often wrestles with personal loss, chronic illness, or a haunting past. He then stumbles upon an extraordinary case, perhaps involving a serial killer or a brutal murder. The movie ends with a twist; the detective overcomes his struggles; sometimes, the audience sympathises with the killer. While most cases end happily, occasionally the detective loses his life or his partner. There are outstanding exceptions like Chinatown or Memories of Murder. (Read why ‘Memories Of Muder is different here.)
Por Thozhil doesn’t deviate from this blueprint. And although this might sound repetitive, the real magic happens in the journey from the start to the finish. That’s where the storyteller can truly make a mark.
From the classic ‘Silence of the Lambs’ to the recent Malayalam thriller ‘Kooman,’ the difference lies in the journey – the route it takes from the departure point to the destination.
However, Por Thozhil doesn’t break new ground. It embraces the cliched template, with several elements reminiscent of countless other detective thrillers. Nikhila Vimal’s character, buddy cop frustrations, mentor cop arrogance, serial killer, and the ending twist are all elements borrowed from a hundred other detective thrillers.
Falling Short of Convincing: The Local Flavour is Missing
One downside of Por Thozhil is that it misses out on the local flavour. The serial killer’s backstory would make more sense in countries with lower population densities( 32/sq.km), like Canada or Australia but in Tamil Nadu with 555 people in a square kilometer, it’s not that convincing.
Why are our filmmakers fixated on these Western-style plotlines?
Why not develop detective thrillers that resonate with our culture, demographics, and geography?
The last time I felt like I was watching an authentic Indian detective thriller was ‘Joseph’, not a mere adaptation of a foreign thriller. Even Ila Veezha Poonchira and Kooman were succesful in adding the local flavour and serving it as a genuine Indian Thriller.
Thrills and Chills: It’s All About the Unravelling
Another bone I have to pick with Por Thozhil is how the narrative unfolds.
It seems as if the clues chase the detective, rather than the other way around. This takes away from the excitement or “got omething new” moment that should naturally come with a thriller.
For example, when you watch the Malayalam thriller ‘Memories’, you will find many occasions where the detective brilliantly did some outside-the-box thinking without his super-computer brain, which can remember and recall everything (like in Por Thozhil).
There’s a scene towards the end where Prakash (Asok Selvan) decodes a ‘who’ in a coffee shop. For me, this was one of the most superficial decodings I’ve ever seen.
The lack of an intensive, painstaking investigative process can make the narrative feel a bit superficial and detracts from the immersive viewing experience.
Por Thozhil Cast: The Saving Grace
Despite the movie’s shortcomings, the performances shine. Sarath Kumar is spectacular as the senior cop. Ashok Selvan’s portrayal of Prakash, the rookie officer, also deserves applause.
Sarath Kumar as Loganathan
Prakash (Ashok Selvan) is a newbie, and initially, Sarath Kumar has little hope or trust in him. There’s a scene where Prakash determines the time of death by measuring the brain temperature of the dead body (If you watch thrillers, nothing new in the method). Sarath Kumar’s subtle reaction beautifully conveys a sense of pride, a kind of “Paravayilley” reaction.
Asok Selvan as Prakash
Sharath Kumar mesmerised me with his effortless acting and the subtle reactions throughout the movie.
The casting of late actor Sarath Babu is another highlight. His portrayal of the vulnerable and guilt-ridden antagonist brings a sense of realism to his character.
Nikhila Vimal, however, has room for improvement.I didn’t see the character Veena in the film; instead, I saw Nikhila Vimal playing a supporting role to Sarath Kumar.
Nikhila Vimal as Veena
There’s another character I want to mention, but that might be a spoiler. The casting could have been better there as well. It wasn’t convincing considering body language, reaction, or emotional appeal.
My Suggestion
For debutant director Vignesh Raja, Por Thozhil seems like a safe bet. His clever blend of elements works for a mainstream audience, making the movie a passable watch for fans of the genre. Despite some missteps, the film is a testament to his potential as a promising filmmaker.
It’s not groundbreaking, but it still manages to be an entertaining watch. The actors, especially Sarath Kumar and Ashok Selvan, do a fine job. If you’re in the mood for a decent detective thriller, Por Thozhil might be just the ticket.
Veeran is about a man named Kumaran, played by Hiphop Adhi, who gains superpowers due to a childhood incident. He has the ability to control minds for a short period and can discharge electric arcs. The movie is set in a village where a corporate body, led by a character named Sharath, plans to implement a dangerous project.
Scene from Veeran Movie
Kumaran decides to use his powers to protect his village and its people. He disguises himself as the long-forgotten guardian deity of the village, Veeran. The film’s narrative revolves around Kumaran’s journey in stopping the corporate project and how Sharath (Vinay Rai) plans to remove Veeran from their path.
The movie directed by ARK Saravan, explores themes of Myth, Massy-Superpower and village absurd comedy. Despite being a superhero movie, it tried to keep its touch with reality and village life, and these aspects make it interesting. The humor, action, and music add to the charm of the film.
It’s Not Minnal Murali, It’s a Mix-Bag
Veeran” does share some similarities with other films like Vijay’s Velayudham, Nikhil’s Karthikeya, Ram Kumar’s Mundasupatti, and Basil Joseph’s Minnal Murali. However, in the end it maintains its own identity, thanks to Da Vinci Code (Maybe an inspiration 🙂 ).
Veeran reminds us of “Velayudham” because of the dialogues, costumes, and the climax, where the protagonist assumes a guardian deity’s identity to protect his people.
The character sketch of Veeran bears a resemblance to “Karthikeya”.
The narration around the temple in “Veeran” is quite similar to “Mundasupatti”, and there is even a dialogue referencing it.
Scene from Veeran Movie
Minnal Murali seems to have inspired Veeran in its plot and acts. Even the character of Kaali Venkat in Veeran appears to be similar to Aju Varghese’s role in Minnal Murali. Both characters provide comic relief and being a detective behind the main super-heroes.
The major difference between Veeran and Minnal Murali is in the writing. Minnal Murali has a steady, well-paced character development and transformation into a superhero, whereas Veeran tends to be more sudden in these aspects because of its poor writing.
What Could Have Been Better: Writing
Firstly, the pacing in the first half of the movie could have been better. The story’s development and character introductions felt sudden and could have been more gradual to allow the audience to connect better with the characters and their transformations.
Secondly, the narrative suffers from various logical loopholes. This indicates that the script could have used a little more time and thought. A more tightly woven plot would have significantly enhanced the movie’s overall impact.
Thirdly, the utilization of the superhero aspect of Veeran could have been done more creatively. The film does not fully explore the potential of Adhi’s superpowers, especially in the confrontations.
R BADREE in Veeran
Finally, the villain characters, played by Vinay Rai & R Badree, could have been more compelling. A stronger antagonist would have added more tension to the plot, making the story more engaging for the viewers.That’s what worked best for Minnal Murali.
Why You Should Try Veeran
Unique Setting
Veeran is set in a rural backdrop, offering a fresh and inter
esting take on the usual urban-centric superhero movies. The depiction of village life and its nuances add to the film’s charm.
This week, there are two super-heroes Spiderman and Veeran, I believe children should try this different superhero. Let them get a different perspective.
Superhero Theme
For fans of superhero movies, Veeran presents a novel, desi superhero, which isn’t very common in Indian cinema, especially Tamil cinema. The unique powers of mind control and discharging electric arcs set our hero apart.Thanks to Minnal Murali for this initiative.
Hiphop Adhi as VEERAN
Performance of Hiphop Adhi, R Badree & others.
Hiphop Adhi, as the lead character, delivers a solid performance. His portrayal of the superhero character, with all its complexities, is commendable and a major reason to watch the movie. R Badree nailed his role as a villain.
Good use of Comedy & Myth
The film manages to weave in subtle-humor throughout the plot, making it entertaining. Especially, the situational comedy sequences involving R Badree is a special treat. There is a surprise comedy for you from Munshikanth and Kaali Venkat in the climax.
Kaali Venkat, Munishkanth in Veeran Movie
The way Veeran(Kumaran) uses Myth, is intriguing, it clearily shows how religious systems works, this is where I felt like Veeran is a mediocre Mundassupatti. But still it’s worth considering there are no creepy romantic track.
A scene from Veeran Movie
My Suggestion
Veeran doesn’t quite reach the heights of films like “Minnal Murali”, it still manages to entertain and engage the audience to a certain extent.People were laughing and clapping at theatre, especially children enjoyed the most, I guess.
Remember the first half is slow-paced & poorly written, but in the second half Veeran team did a better job. You may find some thrilling moments.
If you’re a fan of superhero movies and are interested in seeing a different take on the genre, Veeran could be worth a watch. But go in without high expectations, and you might find yourself enjoying the film.
Asur season 1 presents a fascinating blend of mythological lore and modern-day crime. In this blog post, I will explain the reasons why Asur season 1 stands out, highlight the cast and performances, and provide a recap of the episode-wise plot points.This will serve as a refresher for those who are eagerly anticipating the release of Asur season 2.
Asur Season 1 trailer
The series has made a significant impact on the Indian web series scenario due to its unique concept and storytelling, which blends two very contrasting themes – ancient Indian mythology and modern forensic science – into a compelling narrative that keeps you on the edge of your seat.
What sets Asur apart is its innovative use of mythology in a crime thriller. The show introduces us to a serial killer who commits horrifying murders while drawing inspiration from ancient Hindu mythological texts.
The philosophical underpinnings in each episode, particularly the dichotomy of good and evil, add a deeper layer to the narrative. It’s not just about catching a criminal; it’s about understanding human nature and the inherent capacity for both good and evil within us all.
Asur season 1 Cast: Worth Applauding
The performances in Asur are top-notch. A notable digital debut is made by Arshad Warsi, known for his comedic roles, as a no-nonsense forensic expert. His portrayal of Dhananjay Rajpoot (DJ), an intense and egoistic senior forensic expert, is refreshing and showcases the versatility of the actor.
Barun Sobti impresses as Nikhil Nair, a forensic expert-turned-teacher, grappling with personal and professional conflicts. His performance successfully conveys the internal struggle and dedication of the character to his craft. The engaging narrative of the series is further elevated by the commendable performances of the ensemble cast, including Ridhi Dogra, Anupriya Goenka, Amey Wagh, and Sharib Hashmi.
Story of Asur Season 1
Asur Episode 1 – The Dead Can Talk
It’s 11 years ago in the holy city of Varanasi. A young boy, son of a priest, is being readied to take on his father’s role. But things take a strange turn. After a ritual by the river, the father asks his son for water. The next thing you know, the father’s lifeless body is sinking into the river. We see the son again, his face smeared with ashes by a group of Aghori saints, and in his hand, he holds a cut finger. Could this be his father’s finger? Did he…kill his father?
Episode 1 from Asur season 1
Now, let’s zoom out of this mystery and travel across continents to the present-day FBI Training Centre in the USA. Here, we meet Nikhil Nair, who left his CBI job to teach forensic science. “The dead can talk,” he tells his students, alluding to how the deceased provide enough evidence to catch their killer. He’s good at his job, his knack for deductions proved when his friend asks his opinion on a murder case. But his past still calls him back to the CBI, particularly through an incessant Shashank Awasthi.
The Horror begins
Meanwhile, a gruesome scene unfolds in Delhi. A woman’s body, assaulted and burnt, is discarded in a jungle, reduced to a gruesome spectacle. This news reaches Nikhil, causing distress at home. His wife, Naina, isn’t happy about him considering going back to CBI, a place he left for their family. This disagreement spirals into a full-blown argument, revealing the cracks in their relationship.
The next morning, a new crime scene is discovered in Delhi, a body left in a terrifying state. Dr. Dhananjay Rajpoot, also known as DJ, arrives at the CBI headquarters in New Delhi. An old photo of him and his wife, Sandhya, hints at some history. A surprising twist comes in the form of a mysterious audio file from the killer, taunting DJ.
Scene from Episode 1 of Asur season 1
As the episode concludes, we see Nikhil taking a painful decision, leaving his family in the USA to return to Delhi. At the same time, a terrifying discovery is made – the woman who was brutally killed was none other than DJ’s wife, Sandhya, a devastating revelation that leaves us gasping for more.
Asur Episode 2 – Rabbit Hole
In the second episode of Asur, we go back 18 years, to the ancient city of Varanasi. We meet Shubh, a curious child who has a unique approach to studying the Gita, leading his stern father to label him as ‘Asur ka avatar’. Shubh’s peculiarity is on full display, especially after a disturbing incident with a puppy.
In today’s time, the CBI team, still reeling from the gruesome murder of Sandhya, who was a renowned painter and DJ’s spouse, takes on the challenging task of uncovering the mystery.
This mystery leads them far away to Nagaland, where another person is found dead in the same creepy way. This is where Nikhil enter the scene.
Scene from Episode 2 of Asur season 1
Enter Nikhil, a seasoned investigator brought in to replace DJ in this complex case. Past friction between Nikhil and DJ add an undercurrent of tension to the proceedings. Nikhil, in collaboration with Nusrat, a forensic expert, starts to put together the chilling puzzle pieces, all seemingly leading back to DJ.
Hidden GPS systems, late-night autopsies, peculiar tattoos, and Sandhya’s secret abortion start to shape a troubling narrative, pointing towards DJ as the orchestrator of the grim deeds. As DJ is led away in cuffs, the audience is left pondering – is he truly guilty, or just a pawn in a more sinister game? The suspense thickens as the real killer watches the spectacle unfold.
Asur Episode 3 – Peek – a – boo
In the third episode of Asur, a flashback reveals Shubh’s childhood intelligence and anger issues.
In the present day, Nikhil receives coordinates and assembles his team to investigate. DJ is imprisoned while the killer strikes in Kolkata, causing a death by poisoning.
The Delhi coordinates lead to a coffin factory, but no suspicious activity is found. Nikhil suspects a buried victim and discovers DJ’s fingerprints on the money from a previous case. George, a shop owner, goes missing, and Nikhil finds him unconscious in a car near a graveyard.
Scene from Episode 3of Asur season 1
DJ warns Nikhil of imminent danger and reveals a personal connection. At the graveyard, the team discovers a coffin rigged with knives and gas, rendering them unconscious. A man in protective gear takes Nikhil to an unknown location, leaving the audience in suspense for the next episode.
Asur Episode 4 – Ashes from the Past
In the fourth episode of Asur, a flashback shows DJ’s presence during a havan(yagnam) ceremony where Shubh’s father is mysteriously poisoned.
Scene from Episode 4 of Asur season 1
In the present day, Nikhil goes missing, and his family arrives in India. Nikhil wakes up in a secluded place and communicates with the kidnapper through a landline phone.
Meanwhile, DJ receives old case files and analyzes them in jail. The kidnapper sends food to Nikhil but demands his cooperation to ensure his family’s safety. Nikhil observes the kidnapper’s characteristics and sees footage of his wife and daughter on television.
The kidnapper assigns Nikhil a task to suggest a method to murder Abhilasha Chandran, a woman involved in brain-mapping experiments. Nikhil proposes a plan involving a dental appointment and an MRI machine.
The kidnapper carries out the murder as instructed. CBI discovers another murder near a lake, prompting DJ to recall the suspicious incident in Varanasi. DJ joins the team at the underwater crime scene and suspects Nikhil’s involvement based on similarities to a past case. The episode leaves viewers questioning how Nikhil will communicate with DJ to escape the kidnapper’s clutches.
Asur Episode 5 – The Devil has a Face
In the sixth episode of Asur, a flashback reveals Shubh’s arrest for his father’s murder, with DJ working on the case.
Scene from Episode 5 of Asur season 1
In the present day, Naina learns about another victim and refuses to believe the theory that Nikhil might be the killer. Nikhil, disturbed by his actions, demands cigarettes from the kidnapper. Lolark seeks permission for DJ to work on the case from jail but is denied by Shashank Awasthi.
Nikhil watches the news about the neuroscientist’s body being found and becomes overwhelmed with guilt. Lolark visits Varanasi to gather information about Shubh and meets an ex-police officer. DJ attends a counseling session in jail led by Kesar Bhardwaj, where they discuss religion and karma. Awasthi finally permits DJ to work on the case, and a new team member, Samarth, joins. Lolark learns about Shubh’s peculiar behavior in jail before his alleged death in a fire.
The CBI team begins their investigation, and DJ realizes that the killer is using Nikhil’s family as leverage. Nikhil attempts to communicate by manipulating the television’s wiring. Samarth suggests studying the victims’ horoscopes, and Nikhil receives his second target, Aditya Jalan. Naina confronts DJ about the officers outside her home, and Lolark discovers Shubh’s records.
The episode ends with DJ recalling his interaction with Shubh during his arrest, hinting at a possible connection between Shubh and the killer.
Asur Episode 6 – The Firewall
Taking a different turn, the sixth episode of Asur begins with a flashback in Kolhapur, where a renowned painter narrates a story to his grandson about the defeat of the Asur Kali. However, the painter is brutally murdered by a masked man who claims to be sending a message to God.
In the present day, Nikhil plans to murder philanthropist Aditya Jalan, but struggles to breach his tight security. DJ contacts a Balinese mask instructor for information but learns that the instructor is blind. Nikhil battles with his past decisions and has an imaginary conversation with DJ for guidance.
Nusrat creates an age-progression photo of Shubh to see his current appearance. Lolark visits Shubh’s grandfather in Varanasi and discovers Shubh’s sketchbook filled with drawings of demons. DJ and Samarth consult a fake priest for horoscope analysis and later seek Kesar’s help. They learn that all the victims were born in the Delphinus constellation.
Another Hint & Hope
DJ realizes that the SIC database holds the required information and asks Rasul to breach its security. In a vision, Nikhil sees a way to murder Aditya using medicine. Rasul eventually hacks the SIC database with Naina’s assistance. Nikhil connects the television to a police walkie-talkie signal and continues studying forensic science books. DJ discusses Shubh’s story and sketchbook with Lolark.
The team suspects Aditya Jalan as the killer’s next target due to his charitable nature. The kidnapper calls DJ, confirming their suspicion and revealing the date of the planned murder. DJ wonders how the kidnapper obtained internal information. DJ and the team prepare for Aditya’s engagement with heightened security, but Aditya dismisses the threat. Rasul and Sajid attend the engagement, and DJ identifies a toy truck as a potential bomb.
The bomb detonates harmlessly in a freezer. However, the lights go out momentarily, and when they come back, Aditya is found dead, poisoned, with the killer’s Balinese mask nearby.
The episode leaves viewers intrigued about the aftermath of this incident.
Asur Episode 7 – Let There be Darkness
Straying from its usual path, the seventh episode of Asur, takes us back 10 years to Varanasi, where Nikhil visits Shubh in jail. Shubh refuses to admit his crime and blames DJ, leaving a cryptic message that they will meet soon.
The CBI struggles to recover from the failure to save Aditya Jalan. During Aditya’s autopsy, DJ and Nusrat discover that Nikhil used Aditya’s ulcer problem to poison him. Two additional non-toxic elements in Aditya’s bloodstream puzzle DJ, as they appear to be a message from Nikhil.
The kidnapper rewards Nikhil with cigarettes and hints at his omnipresence. DJ delves into Hindu mythology and consults Kesar for assistance. The team realizes that the killer targets achievers and believes himself to be the mythological devil Kali.
Nikhil has an imaginary conversation with Nusrat and recalls his past with Naina. DJ faces obstacles in the investigation, including a slow SIC server and the revelation that the podcast voice is not Kesar’s. Dhananjay(DJ) and Naina decipher Nikhil’s message, leading them to suspect Shubh’s involvement and an accomplice.
DJ decodes the meaning of two elements and sends teams to search corresponding coordinates in Delhi. Lolark suspects Kesar and provides DJ with a linguistic report. Naina tracks the killer’s search activity, and DJ requests Naina to add his name to the SIC database as bait.
The episode ends as the killer discovers DJ’s name in the database. The penultimate episode leaves viewers on the edge, anticipating the answers in the final installment.
Asur Episode 8 – End is The Beginning
The final episode of Asur takes us back 10 years to Varanasi, where DJ and Nikhil discuss Shubh’s case. DJ fabricates evidence against Shubh, leading to Nikhil’s resignation from the CBI.
In the present day, the search for Nikhil continues, and DJ anticipates the killer’s arrival at Central Jail to target him. The CBI discovers that Neeraj Jadhav, Radhika Venkatesh, and Umar Sayyed are missing, potentially the next targets. The kidnapper grows impatient, suspecting a trap set by DJ.
DJ becomes suspicious of Kesar and sends a team to his home. The three hostages are trapped in a chamber with limited oxygen, forced to fight for survival. DJ uncovers Kesar’s fake identity and his potential connection to Shubh. Rasul’s behavior raises doubt, especially when he attacks Lolark.
Scene from Episode 8 of Asur season 1
Nikhil escapes his confinement and collects crucial evidence from the kidnapper’s location.
A Big Revelation & A Twist
DJ manages to overpower the kidnapper in his room. However, during Shashank’s interrogation of Kesar, it is revealed that the kidnapper is part of Shubh’s cult.
The live broadcast shows the hostages’ desperate struggle for oxygen. DJ confesses his past fabrication to Shubh and takes pills in exchange for information.
Nikhil, Naina, and the backup team arrive at the chemical factory. Rasul challenges Nikhil to choose between his daughter and the hostages, resulting in a devastating choice. DJ’s condition worsens, and he is rushed to the hospital. Riya, Nikhil’s daughter, is poisoned by a member of the cult.
Lolark is killed by Rasul, and Radhika shoots Umar in a shocking turn of events. Naina and Nikhil find Riya dead, leading to an emotional outburst directed at DJ. Rasul, still hiding his true identity, takes Nikhil away.
Climax scene Asur season 1
The episode concludes with DJ’s suspension and the revelation that Rasul is the real Shubh.
Climax scene Asur season 1
Finally, the camera pans out as Shubh shares a chilling final gaze with DJ, leaving viewers on the edge of their seats and eagerly anticipating the next season.
Asur’s final episode delivers thrilling revelations and sets the stage for a potential second season, leaving viewers eagerly awaiting the future of the Shubh vs DJ and Nikhil conflict.